PDA

View Full Version : Why don't Rangers get an Acro class?



Tykwa
Apr 29, 2007, 01:04 AM
I'm Mad, Theres AcroTECHer and AcroFigher (or somthing) why isn't there an Acroranger?

AC9breaker
Apr 29, 2007, 01:06 AM
Because there is nothing that could be done to make such a class that would make it unique/useful/not broken.

Zorafim
Apr 29, 2007, 01:09 AM
Erm, I thought the concept of ranger was acro in and of itself.

PhotonDrop
Apr 29, 2007, 01:48 AM
because not every weapon needs to be fired like a mechgun

VanHalen
Apr 29, 2007, 01:49 AM
On 2007-04-28 23:48, PhotonDrop wrote:
because not every weapon needs to be fired like a mechgun



Your posting in PSU General? Btw I wanted to say before, I LOVE YOUR SIG!

Kiku
Apr 29, 2007, 03:04 AM
You know, its just the demo...

They still have TONS of time to change things, they might add a AcroGunner or whatever...


and besides, how weird would it be to get an S armor on C?

EphekZ
Apr 29, 2007, 03:08 AM
Like the above posters said, what else do Gunners need?
they have
FG-pure ranger
GT-Support and ranger
Fg-melee and ranger
PT-Heavy melee and heavy ranger

wtf else do they need?

Eleina
Apr 29, 2007, 04:17 AM
Acrogunner would be a 1 handed gun specialist....but that already exists and is called Guntecher

Akaimizu
Apr 29, 2007, 07:45 AM
To tell the truth, that's pretty much right on the money. Acrotecher also has a lot of overlap compared to the Guntecher as well. One of the reasons why Tynselle will dabble in it. (The other is being to actually try and get used to wielding a Photon Whip like her father does, in the circus).

Shiro_Ryuu
Apr 29, 2007, 09:15 AM
I dunno, I was curious of this myself, and IMO, Acro =/= Gunner. It would be nice to have an Acrogunner, but like someone else said, it'll be wierd to find a way to fit it in at this time.

Dhylec
Apr 29, 2007, 09:33 AM
It's not needed. The improved weapon ranking & rest of the classes already covered pretty much everything that is left out on v1.
Oh boy, I hope Sou doesn't see this topic. ;]

Shiro_Ryuu
Apr 29, 2007, 10:25 AM
Hurry, lets post in the other threads before Sou comes.

Lamak
Apr 29, 2007, 10:48 AM
Acrogunner could be a class focusing on Light Guns, but has access to double sabers? >_>

SStrikerR
Apr 29, 2007, 10:52 AM
dhylec deleted my post.
and i agree with some of you, what more do they need?

Soukosa
Apr 29, 2007, 05:02 PM
aF = Class built around fast reflexes with light melee weapons and a side of ranged weapons.
aT = Variation of aF that uses techs.

aG = What? The two already have guns and since the classes also use melee... well, there's no point since it's just be aF.

DonRoyale
Apr 29, 2007, 05:04 PM
On 2007-04-29 01:04, Kiku wrote:
You know, its just the demo...

They still have TONS of time to change things, they might add a AcroGunner or whatever...

Zorafim
Apr 29, 2007, 05:10 PM
The way ST seems to handle "Acro" is to give the job more ata and evp. Seeing how gunner jobs are already ata and evp based, I don't see how adding even more will get what we want.