Pants or no pants...

[Weeaboolits]

Are shorts the middle ground? http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_confused.gif

[Sord]

shorts are allowed, as are kilts, cloaks, and robes, leotards on permission.

[Solstis]

The DTPA zealots would burn you alive for wearing hotpants, much less shorts.

[Weeaboolits]

I don't like shorts. :/

[Sord]

On 2007-08-07 00:54, Solstis wrote:
The DTPA zealots would burn you alive for wearing hotpants, much less shorts.


actually, on a few occasions I think Kiz wore hot pants.

we do not burn people alive or with shorts, if they happen to be alive and wearing pants, well, we're just saving them and adding some dicipline into it so they don't forget the favor we just performed.

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

On 2007-08-07 00:58, Ronin_Cooper wrote:
I don't like shorts. :/


That means you like pants, and then pizza, but not BlueDagger.

[Nani-chan]

/facepalm

[Solstis]

Capris?

[Allos]

On 2007-08-07 08:25, Solstis wrote:
Capris?



Capris are a definite no-no. They come too far down the leg.

And the Kizaragu hot-pants rumor was started by the ADTPA to try and split us up...bastards.

[astuarlen]

On 2007-08-07 00:54, Solstis wrote:
The DTPA zealots would burn you alive for wearing hotpants, much less shorts.


Fearmonger. There's nothing inherently violent about opposition to pants. It is a faith of peace and freedom from leg oppression, and I think it is grossly unfair of you to apply the sentiments of a few extremists to the DTPA (and non-denominational pants protesters) as a whole.

[Solstis]

On 2007-08-07 11:21, astuarlen wrote:

On 2007-08-07 00:54, Solstis wrote:
The DTPA zealots would burn you alive for wearing hotpants, much less shorts.


Fearmonger. There's nothing inherently violent about opposition to pants. It is a faith of peace and freedom from leg oppression, and I think it is grossly unfair of you to apply the sentiments of a few extremists to the DTPA (and non-denominational pants protesters) as a whole.



There is something inherently violent to firey opposition to pants.

I, good ma'am, believe that I have a right to wear pants without persecution!

I OBJECT. Pants wearers everywhere have their daily business stymied by propoganda and hateful slurs. Threats of burnings and desecration even abound.

I am shocked and appalled that you would support a group that would support denim and khaki based terrorism.

[astuarlen]

Know what? Your personal beliefs, cultural norms, and right to sartorial self-determination be damned! The DTPA is going to liberate Iraq your legs, like it or not, bud.

[BlueDagger]

On 2007-08-07 23:11, astuarlen wrote:
Know what? Your personal beliefs, cultural norms, and right to sartorial self-determination be damned! The DTPA is going to liberate Iraq your legs, like it or not, bud.



That's not all its going to liberate.

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

What's their motivation?

Taking out sweatshops? Good.

Taking out people they simply discriminate against for no California Raisin? Wacky & tacky.

[Solstis]

On 2007-08-07 23:11, astuarlen wrote:
Know what? Your personal beliefs, cultural norms, and right to sartoral self-determnaton be damned! The DTPA is going to lberate raq your legs, lke eet or not, bud.



Aw, hell. ;o;

Just lke when they took ndgo away.

[astuarlen]

We had good ntellgence ndcatng that ndgo was responsble for bad thngs.

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

On 2007-08-07 23:50, Solstis wrote:

On 2007-08-07 23:11, astuarlen wrote:
Know what? Your personal beliefs, cultural norms, and right to sartoral self-determnaton be damned! The DTPA is going to lberate raq your legs, lke eet or not, bud.


Aw, hell. ;o;

Just lke when they took ndgo away.

Sollyfrend joo left za eye n be-leafs, not tea leaves though.

t's cool though. A mnus! (Weeeeernstrom!)