Anyone else notice how all the

[Tact]

I don't know. http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif

[DikkyRay]

Old Fkl-ers only post in topics only made by old fkl-ers?
Excpt Haya, Sord, and Tact. What are they, too good for us? Are we "inferior" to them?

I forgot Mix, Dhy, Meira, the occasional Geewj.....

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: DikkyRay on 2007-08-28 18:07 ]</font>


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: DikkyRay on 2007-08-28 18:10 ]</font>

[TalHex]

meh!

[AlexCraig]

Idaknow. Maybe that is where they feel safe. Since they don't know any of us, they post in threads made by other "old" FKLers because they know them.
You also forgot Tystys. But he has only been on and off every once in a while.

[DikkyRay]

Tys is only really as old as Dizzy.

[Weeaboolits]

Because my topics aren't very good. http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_frown.gif

[Shadowpawn]

o.O



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Shadowpawn on 2007-08-28 18:03 ]</font>

[DikkyRay]

Actually, scratch that, Dizzy is older than Tys. Hell, hes only beating me by 4 months

[Mixfortune]

Yeah, those bastards.

[Sord]

1. as of late, not much has given any material to make a good joke
2. we can't tell you not to post or to leave FKL, but we can choose to not reply
3. holy crap, people being biased! that's ubeleivable! NOT.

http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_disapprove.gif

[DizzyDi]

The only other way to lure out the old FKL'ers is to post some Shakespearian type joke.
Ya know the ones.

[DikkyRay]

SO pretty much Sord, Its because we arent funny, and the old people automatically are?

[DikkyRay]

wait, where the hell did the rest of my topic name go?

[AlexCraig]

I don't even know how the "old" FKL was like. From what I have heard and somewhat read, it was vastly different.

[Sord]

On 2007-08-28 18:08, DikkyRay wrote:
SO pretty much Sord, Its because we arent funny, and the old people automatically are?


no, they don't even post enough to be funny. But with nothing funny to even attract them in the first place, they aren't gonna be around long enough to make funny posts anyways.

[Dhylec]

yea, ya gotta be funnay & clevar ;3

[Weeaboolits]

They don' like your topic, they don' post in it. You don' like, tough nuggets, yo.

[Blitzkommando]

Maybe it's because us older posters don't check up on PSOW as much as we used to and stick with who we are familiar with?

[Weeaboolits]

I honestly don' care who posts where, so long as it's amusing.

[geewj]

OMG TTYL R U OK???!!

[astuarlen]

This thread must be the exception that proves the rule.

Also, what doth thou get when thou crosseth a cobbler with a cuckold?

[Solstis]

On 2007-08-28 20:07, astuarlen wrote:
This thread must be the exception that proves the rule.

Also, what doth thou get when thou crosseth a cobbler with a cuckold?



Only the finest Earl Grey, m'dear.

[astuarlen]

Did someone say Boston tea party? Becahz I think I just heahd someone say Bawston tea pahty.

[Solstis]

I waf down in Boftonne, and I do say that their tea is excellent.

[astuarlen]

Capital! Bring out ye olde crumpets (though they tasteth like shoee leathere, I cannot resisteth).

[geewj]

Should one accompany with potatoes, would you entice them with some tea?

[AlexCraig]

Dost anyone care for a scone whilst I have them out?

[geewj]

Throw him a bone for a scone...

I digress
And atone for my tone with a shown
True interest



...I do declare!

[Sord]

bah humbug, let us just go stone a peasant for amusement

[Shadowpawn]

Man, I am totally lost. :/

[AlexCraig]

Stone the peasants!? Art thou mad!? They consort in large numbers of hulking brutes!

[astuarlen]

On 2007-08-28 20:33, Shadowpawn wrote:
Man, I am totally lost. :/



No, you're in jolly olde Londonne, circa fifteen hundred A.D.*


*In a parallel universe.

[Weeaboolits]

Agreed, let us suffer the peasants!

[geewj]

On 2007-08-28 20:36, astuarlen wrote:

On 2007-08-28 20:33, Shadowpawn wrote:
Man, I am totally lost. :/



No, you're in jolly olde Londonne, circa fifteen hundred A.D.*


*In a parallel universe.



I much prefer perpendicular universes

[Sord]

On 2007-08-28 20:34, AlexCraig wrote:
Stone the peasants!? Art thou mad!? They consort in large numbers of hulking brutes!


That is why you pit them against one another dear Alex. Brutes they may be, but educated they are not. They are but mindless sheep to the aristocracy.

[Weeaboolits]

I agree with geewj's assertion of the superiority of universes being at angles of ninety degrees.

[geewj]

On 2007-08-28 20:37, Ronin_Cooper wrote:
Agreed, let us suffer the peasants!



And then hence forth from which back shalt thee build thine kingdom? Thine own?

I offer thee not mine.

[Mayu]

http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_razz.gif

[AlexCraig]

Sord, I do now understand thy message. After all, the greeks of old invented such a thing as wrestling. Why should we hinder this?
Bring out the peasants!

[geewj]

In this we part ways young sirs, for the sport of violence is but the pleasantries of the ignorant masses.

[astuarlen]

On 2007-08-28 20:38, geewj wrote:

I much prefer perpendicular universes



If one traine leaves Heathfield--which, let me remind you, has no railway station in this universe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_towns_with_no_railway_station)--at 3:00 GMT, heading east-north-outward at 72 kmph, and another train (steam-powered, no less) departs leeward from the last stop on The Metro at 0800, traveling at approximately 2 mps, when will the milkman arrive?

Edit: Oh, yes, and how many casualties will there be in the ensuing trainwreck?



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: astuarlen on 2007-08-28 20:48 ]</font>

[AlexCraig]

On 2007-08-28 20:46, geewj wrote:
In this we part ways young sirs, for the sport of violence is but the pleasantries of the ignorant masses.


I do concur. I personally would have nothing of it. I was merely appeasing the wonts of Sord. But if he dost not wish it, then may the peasants rest another night easily.

[geewj]

On 2007-08-28 20:47, astuarlen wrote:

If one traine leaves Heathfield--which, let me remind you, has no railway station in this universe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_towns_with_no_railway_station)--at 3:00 GMT, heading east-north-outward at 72 kmph, and another train (steam-powered, no less) departs leeward from the last stop on The Metro at 0800, traveling at approximately 2 mps, when will the milkman arrive?

Edit: Oh, yes, and how many casualties will there be in the ensuing trainwreck?


Yesterday; Only me and the Sea Monkeys that travel with me. Yes, I was on that flight.

[Sord]

On 2007-08-28 20:42, AlexCraig wrote:
Sord, I do now understand thy message. After all, the greeks of old invented such a thing as wrestling. Why should we hinder this?
Bring out the peasants!


Quite, just make sure they be criminals that die for our amusement, lest we have a mob of rightous revolting peasants on our hands as a result of slaughting innocents.



On 2007-08-28 20:46, geewj wrote:
In this we part ways young sirs, for the sport of violence is but the pleasantries of the ignorant masses.


I must disagree, for do we not wage war for little more than to flaunt our power, obtain more land we need not have, and to give ourself a name in history? It is all quite pointless, the act of war itself is what is truly a delight. Such violence on such a scale is quite wonderful to witness. It contains a sort of barbaric beauty.

[Weeaboolits]

4:30 p.m. (is he never on time?)

42, the rest will be critically injured, but survive (if only long enough to leave the medical center).

[geewj]

On 2007-08-28 20:50, Sord wrote:

On 2007-08-28 20:46, geewj wrote:
In this we part ways young sirs, for the sport of violence is but the pleasantries of the ignorant masses.

I must disagree, for do we not wage war for little more than to flaunt our power, obtain more land we need not have, and to give ourself a name in history? It is all quite pointless, the act of war itself is what is truly a delight. Such violence on such a scale is quite wonderful to witness. It contains a sort of barbaric beauty.


A man relishes in such things because he can not relish in himself.

No man enters into battle without the belief that God is with him. Yet no man believes that God need take his life, save one.

[astuarlen]

On 2007-08-28 20:55, geewj wrote:
A man relishes in such things because he can not relish in himself.


http://www.clearfour.com/condiment/heinz_sweet_relish.jpg

[Sord]

On 2007-08-28 20:55, geewj wrote:

On 2007-08-28 20:50, Sord wrote:

On 2007-08-28 20:46, geewj wrote:
In this we part ways young sirs, for the sport of violence is but the pleasantries of the ignorant masses.

I must disagree, for do we not wage war for little more than to flaunt our power, obtain more land we need not have, and to give ourself a name in history? It is all quite pointless, the act of war itself is what is truly a delight. Such violence on such a scale is quite wonderful to witness. It contains a sort of barbaric beauty.


A man relishes in such things because he can not relish in himself.

No man enters into battle without the belief that God is with him. Yet no man believes that God need take his life, save one.


I do not believe in such foolery as a God, it is merely a pretense to control the masses. If that should be the tool with which I shall direct them into battle, than so be it, I have no qualms in the matter.

[astuarlen]

But do you have relish? I can't very well eat this hotdog without some, good sir! And onions, too; we must have onions.

[Shadowpawn]

Love how Dizzy's complaint became the focal point of the topic.

[Weeaboolits]

http://www.clearfour.com/condiment/

[geewj]

Unfortunately due to a trade embargo we are left to metaphorically, or at best theoretically, top off our hot dogs. But I can offer you a wide variety of milk based alternatives.

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

This thread is like drawing a line down the center of your house where there was no line before.

And one side is all uppity since they probably forgot to include a bathroom on their side.

I'll not post in something before you, watch me!

"Humans love classifying things."

Cows go moo.

[Blitzkommando]

Nay, humans doth lust in the art of development. Thus spake Zarathustra Steve Ballmer (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6304687408656696643).

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

Humans love the cardio and self-cooling powers too.

[Solstis]

On 2007-08-28 21:01, Sord wrote:

On 2007-08-28 20:55, geewj wrote:

On 2007-08-28 20:50, Sord wrote:

On 2007-08-28 20:46, geewj wrote:
In this we part ways young sirs, for the sport of violence is but the pleasantries of the ignorant masses.

I must disagree, for do we not wage war for little more than to flaunt our power, obtain more land we need not have, and to give ourself a name in history? It is all quite pointless, the act of war itself is what is truly a delight. Such violence on such a scale is quite wonderful to witness. It contains a sort of barbaric beauty.


A man relishes in such things because he can not relish in himself.

No man enters into battle without the belief that God is with him. Yet no man believes that God need take his life, save one.


I do not believe in such foolery as a God, it is merely a pretense to control the masses. If that should be the tool with which I shall direct them into battle, than so be it, I have no qualms in the matter.


You can't use God. That wouldn't make sense. God is infinite. People can abuse other people's understanding of God, yes. Use God, no. Your concept of God is limited. Nyah!

[DizzyDi]

Humbug I say to all this riff-raff of deity and death. I'd much rather partake in a good old fashioned nacho party.




<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HAYABUSA-FMW- on 2007-08-29 20:14 ]</font>

[Sord]

On 2007-08-29 10:13, Solstis wrote:

On 2007-08-28 21:01, Sord wrote:

On 2007-08-28 20:55, geewj wrote:

On 2007-08-28 20:50, Sord wrote:

On 2007-08-28 20:46, geewj wrote:
In this we part ways young sirs, for the sport of violence is but the pleasantries of the ignorant masses.

I must disagree, for do we not wage war for little more than to flaunt our power, obtain more land we need not have, and to give ourself a name in history? It is all quite pointless, the act of war itself is what is truly a delight. Such violence on such a scale is quite wonderful to witness. It contains a sort of barbaric beauty.


A man relishes in such things because he can not relish in himself.

No man enters into battle without the belief that God is with him. Yet no man believes that God need take his life, save one.


I do not believe in such foolery as a God, it is merely a pretense to control the masses. If that should be the tool with which I shall direct them into battle, than so be it, I have no qualms in the matter.


You can't use God. That wouldn't make sense. God is infinite. People can abuse other people's understanding of God, yes. Use God, no. Your concept of God is limited. Nyah!


I was not speaking of God as an entity, but rather an idea.

[Shadowpawn]

On 2007-08-29 10:25, DizzyDi wrote:
Humbug I say to all this riff-raff of deity and death. I'd much rather partake in a good old fashioned nacho party.


A man after my own heart.



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HAYABUSA-FMW- on 2007-08-29 20:15 ]</font>

[Solstis]

Your reason for not believing in God is based on the abuse of the ideal, not the entity. Just calling you out on that. If you're rational enough to reject the institution, you can also accept the entity, whatever indescribable thing it may be.

That's sorta pointless, but, eh.

[Mixfortune]

Timeline fluctuations aside...

Basically, if you were to altogether disappear for a time and return in a year or so, where would you likely to post? In whatever thread you happen to catch that also has your "good ol' buddies" from the "good ol' days" of FKL back when everything was the most awesome of awesomes and genius was at its pinnacle. To add on to the excitement of all the fun and games, despite the actual goings on of the thread or the current surroundings, said returning cameo post would become forced to be nothing more than your "staple style hey dudes recognize me cause this is my staple style that I used to do that I considered funny cause its the only damn thing anyone ever chuckled at or paid attention to in my whole time on this board that is the sole defining trait of my memories I left with my fellow buddies" copy and paste irrelevant fictional mannerism. But it's okay cause you're cool like that and I'm sure everyone will forgive you or just choose to forget within the next two days because you decided to disappear again after such a rare visit.

Though, I'm inclined anyways that there was more collaboration via instant messaging in this most recent episode than is rather being let on. Meh, I say, meh!

[DizzyDi]

I SAY I DO BELIEVE THESE NEEDLESS DISCUSSIONS ABOUT WHO FANCIES WHO HAVE GONE ON QUITE LONG ENOUGH.
LET US BE RID OF OUR CLOTHES AND BE MERRY AND GAY!

[DizzyDi]

You first, Mix.

[Shadowpawn]

On 2007-08-29 20:01, DizzyDi wrote:
I SAY I DO BELIEVE THESE NEEDLESS DISCUSSIONS ABOUT WHO FANCIES WHO HAVE GONE ON QUITE LONG ENOUGH.
LET US BE RID OF OUR CLOTHES AND BE MERRY AND GAY!



XD

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

On 2007-08-29 10:13, Solstis wrote:
You can't use God. That wouldn't make sense. God is infinite. People can abuse other people's understanding of God, yes. Use God, no. Your concept of God is limited. Nyah!


Sting #2 in class:

"Can GOD create a rock so big even he can't move it?"

Conclusion was:
His powers are limited either way. FISSION MAILED

[DizzyDi]

His powers aren't limited, they're UNLIMITED over this world, afterall, according to scripture he did create all the laws. So why wouldn't the creator be able to shift something that he himself can create and undo at his own will?

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

Okay this is how it went.

If he can't create a rock soo big even he can't move it, powers of creating limited.

If he can create a rock soo big that he can't move, his moving powers are limited.

All within the question and its answer here, not bringing in outside sources of his power.

[Shadowpawn]

On 2007-08-29 20:20, DizzyDi wrote:
His powers aren't limited, they're UNLIMITED over this world, afterall, according to scripture he did create all the laws. So why wouldn't the creator be able to shift something that he himself can create and undo at his own will?



Syntax error. The universe is computable (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_physics) after all.

[Sord]

God having created laws, should, in theory, be able to work against these laws. That being said, God can neither be disproven or proven by human means. The alternative is to say that God created laws he couldn't change, and in doing so stripped himself of many powers.

[Weeaboolits]

Or that he would manipuilate said laws rather than ignoring them, if you programmed a game yourself, are you gonna' use a gameshark? http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif

[DizzyDi]

On 2007-08-29 20:51, Shadowpawn wrote:

On 2007-08-29 20:20, DizzyDi wrote:
His powers aren't limited, they're UNLIMITED over this world, afterall, according to scripture he did create all the laws. So why wouldn't the creator be able to shift something that he himself can create and undo at his own will?



Syntax error. The universe is computable (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_physics) after all.



I dunno if I can believe or even begin to wrap my head around the idea that the universe is computable.
Theres a word I'm looking for, I dunno remember what it is, but its definition is pretty much that the universe is in a constant state of chaos.
I mean...You couldn't even BEGIN to compute and notate all that goings on that happen even in your county, much less the entire universe?
Excuse me french but...NIGGA PLEASE.

[DizzyDi]

Jesus christ my head hurts after reading that article and a few related ones that a linked through it. ):

[Zero-mx]

Pro action replay it

[DizzyDi]

NO U

[Sgt_Shligger]

On 2007-08-29 21:05, DizzyDi wrote:

On 2007-08-29 20:51, Shadowpawn wrote:

On 2007-08-29 20:20, DizzyDi wrote:
His powers aren't limited, they're UNLIMITED over this world, afterall, according to scripture he did create all the laws. So why wouldn't the creator be able to shift something that he himself can create and undo at his own will?



Syntax error. The universe is computable (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_physics) after all.



I dunno if I can believe or even begin to wrap my head around the idea that the universe is computable.
Theres a word I'm looking for, I dunno remember what it is, but its definition is pretty much that the universe is in a constant state of chaos.
I mean...You couldn't even BEGIN to compute and notate all that goings on that happen even in your county, much less the entire universe?
Excuse me french but...SHLIGGA PLEASE.



I'm on Dizzy's side with this.

Having infinite power, and the ability to create the entire universe, I doubt God's power has limits based on laws he made.

[Sgt_Shligger]

-Double Post-

Read that theory on a computable universe. . . Makes some remote sense, but I can't imagine what kind of machine can handle all that >_>

[geewj]

On 2007-08-29 20:24, HAYABUSA-FMW- wrote:
Okay this is how it went.

If he can't create a rock soo big even he can't move it, powers of creating limited.

If he can create a rock soo big that he can't move, his moving powers are limited.

All within the question and its answer here, not bringing in outside sources of his power.



That's a very limited view on the powers of a god.

It's not that he can't create the rock, it's that he wouldn't.

You see, God being all things and knowing all thing would know, were a rock in need of lifting, he would be able to lift the rock. Should a rock never need lifting by God, there'd be no reason to limit it's weight. Therefore God would be able to lift any rock, and create a rock of any wight, because he'd know which rocks needed to be of a liftable weight before making them.

God is smart.

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

It was assumed the answer had a yes and no only response.

I didn't necessarily agree.

It was assumed either way he was going to create the rock or not. You can't say he wouldn't since thats a variable not within the constructs of the question.

It made you conclude if he didn't, he wasn't able to.

Class seemed way too small or shy to really get into it and just went with the Intro Philosophy teach's conclusion to the "sting" (paradox/aha) question. Some guy brought up Tattoine and Ewoks though.

[geewj]

If he didn't, he didn't need to.

You're taking a single part of an instance out of context.

You take it out of context and you'll just get theoretical mumbo jumbo that can't tell it's ass from it's face.

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

On 2007-08-30 01:16, geewj wrote:
If he didn't, he didn't need to.

The way the question was worded it forced you to say he couldn't if he didn't.

Yes or no question, no place to explain your answer.

Say yes, teach answers.

Say no, teach answers.

Try to start your reasoning after saying a yes or no, teach paused, looked away and then said no, while saying his answer.

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

On 2007-08-30 00:44, geewj wrote:
That's a very limited view on the powers of a god.

It's not that he can't create the rock, it's that he wouldn't.

It was a limited question.

That would have been a No in the teacher's eyes. No, he can't create a rock soo big even he can't move it.

I'd agree if at any point such a rock were needed to be moved, God would be able to move it. Heck, it could look the same and weigh something else instantaneously upon God's choice since who else is going to notice it within a microsecond(or however long) it takes for God to create/change the stature of the rock.

I didn't continue the discussion since earlier I asked a simple enough question during break about a different concept we were learning and the teach actually walked away from me during his response, motioning to the rest of the class who remained in the room who most likely didn't give a banana about it. "It was a direct question B!" That I came to him at his desk to get a better understanding of in a one on one manner, and it became an opportunity for him to repeat it as it was stated earlier, to the rest of the class who were in break mode, and not helping me get a answer.

Strange, this philosophy guy.

[Sord]

On 2007-08-30 00:50, HAYABUSA-FMW- wrote:
Some guy brought up Tattoine and Ewoks though.



in terms of philosophy? I wanna hear that one http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif

[Shadowpawn]

When the hell did this thread become a debate about God and his uber rock lifting abilities? Let's get back to bashing those elitist snobs!

[Solstis]

The heavy rock question only dispells the Christian perspective of God. Not mine, nyah.

[Weeaboolits]

On 2007-08-30 06:29, Solstis wrote:
nyahhttp://www.pso-world.com/images/items/PUNCH_GUARD-WITHOUTBARS.jpg

[Meyfei]

I ....nyah nyah~~~ - blows up -

[Solstis]

Nyatch? There is a way to defeat the rock question, but it was really long and silly.

[Weeaboolits]

Whenever someone says "nyah", I think of Stella, poor, crazy, defective Stella; she never gets a break.

http://www.pso-world.com/images/items/KNOCK_OUT-WITHOUTBARS.jpg

[astuarlen]

Fools, God IS the rock.

[Mixfortune]

BZZZAAATTT GZZZZAAHHHH!

[Mixfortune]

BZZZAAATTT GZZZZAAHHHH!

[Mixfortune]

BZZZAATT GZZAAAHHH!

[Mixfortune]

BZZZAATT GZZAAAHHH!

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

On 2007-08-30 08:03, Mixfortune wrote:
BZZZAATT GAAAHHHD!


A BZZAT GOD?

Best GOD yet.

The guy brought up Ewoks as in "how do we know Ewoks exist?"

[Weeaboolits]

On 2007-08-30 08:03, Mixfortune wrote:
BZZZAATT GZZAAAHHH!http://ggxlol.highervoltage.net/robo-ky/robobuttonani.gif

[DizzyDi]

don't do that dizzy



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HAYABUSA-FMW- on 2007-08-30 17:41 ]</font>

[Tact]

Oh my goodness, Mixfortune quadruple posted!? http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

On 2007-08-30 17:40, Tact wrote:
Oh my goodness, Mixfortune quadruple posted!? http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif


You did too in the double poster beware thread, but then I don't know which were real and which were moved, merged split, manhandled.

And then that FKL politics thread that followed a law of most likely to get locked as the discussion progressed had lots of lag outs.

[Tact]

On 2007-08-30 17:42, HAYABUSA-FMW- wrote:
You did too in the double poster beware thread, but then I don't know which were real and which were moved, merged split, manhandled.



All of the latest posts there were by my own error. (Yes, a sextuple post. Stupid lag. http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_disapprove.gif)

I had Meira move them into the thread.

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

My internet just goes down most of the afternoon, but even when here late night I have connection problems too.

[HAYABUSA-FMW-]

Double taco again, trying to fit in among the lag ones and intentional double poster tacos.

On 2007-08-30 07:40, astuarlen wrote:
Fools, God IS the rock.


That guy does have a larger scale of eyebrow movement than most people.

He also speaks in his own language of jabroni's and rooty poo's.