PDA

View Full Version : No More 9 Star Rares!



ginko990
Jan 17, 2003, 06:35 PM
Please....I dont think anyone would trade for a 9 star rare. You can find them so easily...SO easily.

Munki
Jan 17, 2003, 06:41 PM
Ginko -

Actually, you are wrong. I have traded countless 9 star rares away for 1 - 2 pdrops each. They are easy to find... but alot of people are too lazy to go out and get them.

Then again... people shouldn't be trying to get rare (and I mean RARE, not red box) weapons by offering 9 stars... I admit that is a fruitless venture

Pynix
Jan 17, 2003, 06:44 PM
OH REALLY!?

I've been hunting for 3 weeks on and off, over 50 hours for an invisible guard. how many stars is that? oh do i hear 9?

9 star stuff are not all easy finds. so dispite the fact that you guys may not want people posting 9 star items, on the contrary! stars dont depict the value of a specific item.

GaijinPUnch
Jan 17, 2003, 08:21 PM
Invisible Guard is a 10-star rare.


I'll take almost ANY 9-star rare if it's got a 40 hit on it, with very few exception. In fact, I think I'll make a post. http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_smile.gif

ginko990
Jan 17, 2003, 08:49 PM
On 2003-01-17 17:21, GaijinPUnch wrote:
Invisible Guard is a 10-star rare.


I'll take almost ANY 9-star rare if it's got a 40 hit on it, with very few exception. In fact, I think I'll make a post. http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_smile.gif




Ok ok ok...one exception. L&K combats with hit %s are beautiful things.

Blue147
Jan 17, 2003, 09:07 PM
well not all of us can waste our time on countless rare hunting hours like some of you people.so in short.STFU!

ginko990
Jan 17, 2003, 09:27 PM
On 2003-01-17 18:07, Blue147 wrote:
well not all of us can waste our time on countless rare hunting hours like some of you people.so in short.STFU!



In short your a queef.

Blue147
Jan 17, 2003, 09:58 PM
you spelled queen wrong.lol.your just mad cuz i'm right and you dont have a theme song.lol



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Blue147 on 2003-01-17 19:00 ]</font>