Kent
Feb 9, 2009, 01:00 AM
So it seems to me that people, in general, are quite forgetful. This is something that not only surfaces on a daily basis with people I know, but this is something that came up all throughout college as well - it may have been the case in schooling prior to that, but all prior schooling I attended was full of people who were both a combination of not trying and provably moronic... Not to mention on the other end of the country.
Lets start with college.
The very first class we ever had, when the group of students I was with started, was a class called "College Success." Basically, the class was how to be a good student - this entailed how to research properly, taking notes, mnemonics, study habits, communication, etc. Very good things that, frankly, should come naturally to people who are serious about getting through college, right?
A couple quarters in, and we get to the meaty stuff - we start programming, we're taking a class on logic and rhetoric (i.e. Successful Arguing 101)... Those kinds of things, things that aren't introductory/preparatory classes or the weakest of general education stuffs (like the aforementioned "College Success"). The same group with which I started was here with me in all of my classes this quarter, which was great, because I'd get to know them and we could talk about whatever during breaks and all that jazz. However, there was a problem: People didn't "get" programming. I had prior experience working with computers, so the whole logical process made sense to me - but despite that I had never touched a piece of code before in my life... Myself and Mr. "database programmer that's going back to college to get his IT degree" are the only ones that actually get it.
No big deal. I'll just offer help during breaks and whatnot. As it turned out, they approached me for help before I approached them - but that's a good thing, and I was happy to help (especially with the synergy between teaching and learning going on).
...Now I like to think that my explanations are both thurough and simplistic enough to be gotten and make sense to people. I like to think that I do an adequate job of supplementing the education of others. However... Things just didn't stick. To the same people, I'd have to repeatedly explain the simplest of virtues of variables, what cout and cin do, function structure, decision statements - nothing ever stuck. Long story short, most of the people failed this class and dropped out of the program simply because once they got their feet wet with code, they'd draw a blank on it. I don't see fault in the teacher for this - after all, she did her job and gave me a good foundation in C++. Up until that point, I could rightfully say that everything I knew about C++ I learned from that teacher, in that class, and that there's virtually no reason for everyone to be failing as miserably as they were, especially granted that they were persuing extra help outside of class.
Now, granted, a good five or six of the people spent their time in class... Not playing World of Warcraft, but rather, botting it, which apparently took entire control of their computers due to the implementation of the bot or something. The rest of them, however, weren't doing such inane things, but were actually trying.
There was a point after class where the instructor approached me and asked of my programming background, because I was doing so well - and was just as surprised as she was completely confused by my complete lack of prior experience.
So, over the years of being in college, I noticed a trend: A lot of people just plain don't remember things that are taught in class, regardless of subject. I could understand not recalling the lessons for a day should, say, something big and traumatic happen right after or the night before, but I'm talking about a regular basis. A daily happening, where people will forget most of what was taught during class. Is it not paying attention? Is it an underlying memory problem?
Moreover, I noticed that most other students take notes during class - which is a good habit... But for the most part, the results aren't all that different. Personally, I don't take notes - I never have. I don't study actively outside of class, unless you were to count working on a project as both practice and study (which, I suppose, works out to the same theoretical extent).
But now, lets look outside the classroom - everyday life of people. Everyday conversations seem to be forgotten usually within a few hours, unless it was about something of particularly vested or emotional interest, or something that required active concentration during the time between conversations. People forget all sorts of random things all of the time. Is it just a difference in perceived importance? Are people expectant of one another to forget almost everything, and to have to repeat themselves? Or, perhaps, the pracice of note-taking and study is, in the end, functionally detrimental to the capacity of being able to recall minute details from memorizing things on-the-fly.
tl;dr version and summation of what I'm wondering:
Is it really that strange to be able to passively remember so many things? Is it wrong and unexpected of people to assume the other person is soaking in all of what they say?
...Or does the "normal" person's memory just have a ridiculous half-life?
...
Bonus question: If you read through this post, could you, from memory, recall the first sentence?
Lets start with college.
The very first class we ever had, when the group of students I was with started, was a class called "College Success." Basically, the class was how to be a good student - this entailed how to research properly, taking notes, mnemonics, study habits, communication, etc. Very good things that, frankly, should come naturally to people who are serious about getting through college, right?
A couple quarters in, and we get to the meaty stuff - we start programming, we're taking a class on logic and rhetoric (i.e. Successful Arguing 101)... Those kinds of things, things that aren't introductory/preparatory classes or the weakest of general education stuffs (like the aforementioned "College Success"). The same group with which I started was here with me in all of my classes this quarter, which was great, because I'd get to know them and we could talk about whatever during breaks and all that jazz. However, there was a problem: People didn't "get" programming. I had prior experience working with computers, so the whole logical process made sense to me - but despite that I had never touched a piece of code before in my life... Myself and Mr. "database programmer that's going back to college to get his IT degree" are the only ones that actually get it.
No big deal. I'll just offer help during breaks and whatnot. As it turned out, they approached me for help before I approached them - but that's a good thing, and I was happy to help (especially with the synergy between teaching and learning going on).
...Now I like to think that my explanations are both thurough and simplistic enough to be gotten and make sense to people. I like to think that I do an adequate job of supplementing the education of others. However... Things just didn't stick. To the same people, I'd have to repeatedly explain the simplest of virtues of variables, what cout and cin do, function structure, decision statements - nothing ever stuck. Long story short, most of the people failed this class and dropped out of the program simply because once they got their feet wet with code, they'd draw a blank on it. I don't see fault in the teacher for this - after all, she did her job and gave me a good foundation in C++. Up until that point, I could rightfully say that everything I knew about C++ I learned from that teacher, in that class, and that there's virtually no reason for everyone to be failing as miserably as they were, especially granted that they were persuing extra help outside of class.
Now, granted, a good five or six of the people spent their time in class... Not playing World of Warcraft, but rather, botting it, which apparently took entire control of their computers due to the implementation of the bot or something. The rest of them, however, weren't doing such inane things, but were actually trying.
There was a point after class where the instructor approached me and asked of my programming background, because I was doing so well - and was just as surprised as she was completely confused by my complete lack of prior experience.
So, over the years of being in college, I noticed a trend: A lot of people just plain don't remember things that are taught in class, regardless of subject. I could understand not recalling the lessons for a day should, say, something big and traumatic happen right after or the night before, but I'm talking about a regular basis. A daily happening, where people will forget most of what was taught during class. Is it not paying attention? Is it an underlying memory problem?
Moreover, I noticed that most other students take notes during class - which is a good habit... But for the most part, the results aren't all that different. Personally, I don't take notes - I never have. I don't study actively outside of class, unless you were to count working on a project as both practice and study (which, I suppose, works out to the same theoretical extent).
But now, lets look outside the classroom - everyday life of people. Everyday conversations seem to be forgotten usually within a few hours, unless it was about something of particularly vested or emotional interest, or something that required active concentration during the time between conversations. People forget all sorts of random things all of the time. Is it just a difference in perceived importance? Are people expectant of one another to forget almost everything, and to have to repeat themselves? Or, perhaps, the pracice of note-taking and study is, in the end, functionally detrimental to the capacity of being able to recall minute details from memorizing things on-the-fly.
tl;dr version and summation of what I'm wondering:
Is it really that strange to be able to passively remember so many things? Is it wrong and unexpected of people to assume the other person is soaking in all of what they say?
...Or does the "normal" person's memory just have a ridiculous half-life?
...
Bonus question: If you read through this post, could you, from memory, recall the first sentence?