PDA

View Full Version : What It's not that it's TLDR...



DreXxiN
Nov 26, 2009, 09:59 PM
It's that you posted it in a big fucking block without seperating anything into paragraphs.

I'll pass.

Happy Thanksgiving d00dz.

Vanzazikon
Nov 26, 2009, 10:53 PM
There's a question that's been on my mind lately: Why doesn't TLDR reveal the truth about itself? I mean, TLDR's off-the-cuff comments constitute an instigation to level filth and slime at everyone opposed to TLDR's monographs. For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. I intend to look closely at TLDR's screeds to see what makes them so effectual at turning bullies loose against us good citizens. I should expect to find—this is a guess that I currently lack sufficient knowledge to verify—that if we don't soon tell TLDR to stop what it's doing, it will proceed with its vexatious wheelings and dealings, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given TLDR our permission to do so. It is a statistical certainty that when TLDR says that everyone with a different set of beliefs from its is going to get a one-way ticket to Hell, it's just plain wrong—not "partially wrong" but "thoroughly and absolutely wrong"—just as it is a statistical certainty that on the issue of communism, TLDR is wrong again. Sure, stopping it is front and center in my work. But TLDR will stop at nothing to construct gas chambers, incinerators, gulags, and concentration camps. This may sound outrageous but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is TLDR so compelled to complain about situations over which it has no control? If you were to ask that of TLDR, it'd really fling a large barrage of insults in your direction instead of actually addressing the question. Please, please, please help me call for proper disciplinary action against TLDR and its forces. Without your help, TLDR will unquestionably reinforce the impression that surly heretics—as opposed to TLDR's coadjutors—are striving to fill our children's minds with uneducated and debasing superstitions. TLDR's favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". It likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. It then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for it to make excessive use of foul language. In my opinion, the real crisis is the dearth of people who understand that there is no real way to undo the consequences of TLDR's frightful pleas. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that the most foolish curmudgeons you'll ever see are deeply impressed by its guff? I would venture the answer has something to do with colonialism. To elaborate, it likes to imply that we can trust it not to infiltrate and then dominate and control the mass media. This is what its scribblings amount to although, of course, they're daubed over with the viscid slobber of chauvinistic drivel devised by its rank-and-file followers and mindlessly multiplied by the most batty extremists I've ever seen. Ostensibly, TLDR does not intend to sacrifice our essential liberties on the altar of political horse-trading but, in fact, I indubitably believe that we should refer to it using the sobriquet "Unpleasant TLDR" because it's so thoroughly unpleasant, not to mention dastardly. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me change the minds of those who place stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfilment in our personal and professional lives. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because TLDR should start developing the parts of its brain that have been impaired by commercialism. At least then it'll stop trying to create some ghastly, pseudo-psychological profile of me to discredit my opinions. TLDR's slogans reek of prætorianism. I use the word "reek" because if I hear TLDR's zealots say, "TLDR can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion" one more time, I'm going to throw up. Think about this: if you looked up "complacent" in the dictionary, you'd probably see TLDR's logo. This may be a foregone conclusion, but TLDR is entirely gung-ho about lexiphanicism because it lacks more pressing soapbox issues. TLDR doesn't want us to condemn its criminal ineptitude. It would rather we settle for the meatless bone of Jacobinism. Although the proper definition of "uncharacteristically" is hotly disputed, TLDR's gift—or genius—is how effectively it's able to defy the law of the land. I will now cite the proof of that statement. The proof begins with the observation that TLDR's perversions are not witty satire, as it would have you believe. They're simply the horny ramblings of something that has no idea or appreciation of what it's mocking. TLDR's equivocations are based on hate. Hate, revanchism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life. When we tease apart the associations necessary to TLDR's contemptible, bad-tempered ideas, we see that TLDR claims that it could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. Predictably, it cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist. I agree that TLDR advertises its strict morality solely to shift attention away from its many vices. But I also think that TLDR's declamations have created a dirty, headstrong universe devoid of logic and evidence. Only within this universe does it make sense to say that TLDR's zingers are not worth getting outraged about. Only within this universe does it make sense to irritate an incredible number of people. And, only if we criticize the obvious incongruities presented by it and its janissaries can we destroy this evil, recalcitrant universe of its and exemplify the principles of honor, duty, loyalty, and courage. TLDR insists that its communiqués won't be used for political retribution. That lie is a transparent and strained effort to keep us from noticing that I have one itsy-bitsy problem with its belief systems. Videlicet, they leave us in the lurch. And that's saying nothing about how it frequently avers its support of democracy and its love of freedom. But one need only look at what it is doing—as opposed to what it is saying—to understand its true aims. It is grossly misleading merely to claim that ageism doesn't work. So why does TLDR cling to it? To ask that question another way, why can't TLDR simply enjoy the fruits of its own labors and let other people enjoy the fruits of theirs? The only clear answer to emerge from the conflicting, contradictory stances that TLDR and its expositors take is that TLDR has an uncritical—almost a worshipful—attitude toward the most testy rascals you'll ever see. When TLDR stated that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power, I concluded that it was totally possession-obsessed. Now that it claims that loud ex-cons should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers, I warrant that it's crossed the line into post-rationalist neo-Hegelianism. TLDR yields to the mammalian desire to assert individuality by attracting attention. Unfortunately, for TLDR, "attract attention" usually implies "lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality". Contrast, for example, TLDR's epigrams with those of blockish featherbrained-types, and observe that there is no contrast. I, by (genuine) contrast, take the view that TLDR truly believes that honor counts for nothing. It is just such irrational, unstable megalomania, stroppy egoism, and intellectual aberrancy that stirs TLDR to cause the destruction of human ambition and joy. Do you really think TLDR will ever learn from its mistakes? Many organizations lie. However, TLDR lies with such ease it's troubling. TLDR has repeatedly threatened to place impulsive propagandists at the head of a nationwide kakistocracy. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because TLDR's drug-induced ravings are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk"—an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well—because TLDR's lies come in many forms. Some of its lies are in the form of bunco games. Others are in the form of opuscula. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. But it gets worse than that. Next time, TLDR, you may want to check your facts correctly. TLDR's barbs may not be traditional for a psychotic rake, but in a tacit concession of defeat, TLDR is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what its misguided denunciations have failed at. I have a plan to disabuse TLDR of the notion that anyone who dares to provide an antidote to contemporary manifestations of unambitious, obstinate racialism can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result. I call this plan "Operation straighten out TLDR's thinking". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by TLDR's vulgar insinuations, but it and I are as different as chalk and cheese. TLDR, for instance, wants to develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of revisionism. I, on the other hand, want to appeal for comity between us and TLDR. That's why I need to tell you that some venom-spouting, despicable quidnuncs actually profess that our only chance of saving the planet is to accept unending regulations and straightjacket "reforms" from its foot soldiers. This is the kind of muddled thinking that it is encouraging with its orations. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as illogical flibbertigibbets. Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that we should lay out some ideas and interpretations that hold the potential for insight. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) Ribald swindlers can go right ahead and convict me for saying that TLDR's unsavory mind games exhibit the patina of wowserism, but History, acting as the goddess of a higher truth and a higher justice, will one day smilingly tear up this verdict, acquitting me of all guilt and blame. The pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to put to rest egocentric and ophidian obloquies such as TLDR's? So, sorry for being so long-winded in this letter, but the only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by infinity is to contemplate the extent of TLDR's stupidity.

Happy Thanksgiving, Folks.

Volcompat321
Nov 26, 2009, 11:07 PM
Vanz said "TLDR" 61 times.
Happy Thanksgiving.