hhmmmm...

[epeon]

I just beat falz on vh mode and I'm L.61!
when my RAmar was L.60, I was on hard mode.
so could it be that HUmars are better?

[Ketchup345]

HUmars are not better, but you may be more of a HUnter, and not a RAnger. Also, ou may have been more willing to try the bosses with your HUmar than your RAmar (huge part, you may not have felt ready to take a boss with your RAmare when you easily could have).

[Butoden]

Uhuh. And you also got some experience with bosses right now so that helps of course http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_smile.gif

[epeon]

On 2004-02-14 05:40, Butoden wrote:
Uhuh. And you also got some experience with bosses right now so that helps of course http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_smile.gif



yes, that's true and offcourse some strategies for enemies. but the thing that bothered me most about RAmars is that they are so weak. i have to use shifta all the time. even with my mag with 125 pow.
he's L. 128 now and my HUmar (L.64) is even stronger now.

[Butoden]

On 2004-02-14 06:17, epeon wrote:

On 2004-02-14 05:40, Butoden wrote:
Uhuh. And you also got some experience with bosses right now so that helps of course http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_smile.gif



yes, that's true and offcourse some strategies for enemies. but the thing that bothered me most about RAmars is that they are so weak. i have to use shifta all the time. even with my mag with 125 pow.
he's L. 128 now and my HUmar (L.64) is even stronger now.

RAmars get higher ATA, that's why they're called Rangers, they can equip better guns at lower levels while Hunter can equip better slash-weapons and more stronger slash-weapons such as Swords and Daggers. While Rangers can equip shots and rifles.
Think about this:
Before your Hunter can even start hitting an enemy, your Ranger with a rifle would already have killed it http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_smile.gif
And BTW, RAcasts have highest ATP of the Ranger-Class. So maybe that's more to your likings?

[Nai_Calus]

On 2004-02-14 07:00, Butoden wrote:

Before your Hunter can even start hitting an enemy, your Ranger with a rifle would already have killed it http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_smile.gif



So untrue it's not even funny. XD Then again, I'm biased with RAmars, mine only made it to L48 and Ult Forest before I killed him. My HUmar didn't even make Ult until L60, but then, he wasn't -capable- of being twinked, being then my first and only char. XD The RAmar was, and even with S/D he couldn't do fsck-all, even with a Justy(Demon's Special).

And my L104 RAmarl does not out-damage what my HUmar did then, even with OMGWTFl337 guns and her S/D/J/Z

Oh yeah. HUmars -are- better than RAmars. There's no getting around it when you look at their support techniques. HUmar has Jellen and Zalure. RAmar does not. Therefore, the RAmar is an unusable piece of crap whose only benefit is the best ATA in the game. http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif At least the RA droids have traps. XD And RAmar's MST is so low as to be worthless and damn near makes the HUmar look like a FOnewearl in comparison.

Er... Anyway. If you want a RA, I really suggest RAmarl or RAcast above RAmar. RAmarl has a full set of support techs which can get up to L20, a max MST not that much behind the HUnewearl's that lets her actually -heal- herself with Resta, and she's way better looking. RAcast has the highest ATP of the RAs , right up there with the lower-end ATP HUs, and IIRC gets the highest HP in the game eventually. Plus he has traps, which can be even more useful than techs(Rabarta freezes. Sometimes. Freeze Traps always freeze. Confuse traps turn those nasty enemies coming towards you on eachother while you help them pick themselves off.)

[Butoden]

Looks as if you're an Android-Lover!
It's true that the traps could be handy, but I'd still prefer Resta!! I just made Viridia RAmarl and she's not that bad actually! I still prefer the Hunter-Class though http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_smile.gif

[Jarek]

why do these kinds of topics get started all the time???

such and such is better than such and such, blah blah blah.

just play the damn game with whoever you like best and leave it at that.

[epeon]

[/quote]RAmars get higher ATA, that's why they're called Rangers, they can equip better guns at lower levels while Hunter can equip better slash-weapons and more stronger slash-weapons such as Swords and Daggers. While Rangers can equip shots and rifles.
Think about this:
Before your Hunter can even start hitting an enemy, your Ranger with a rifle would already have killed it http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_smile.gif
And BTW, RAcasts have highest ATP of the Ranger-Class. So maybe that's more to your likings?

[/quote]

well, i had a HUcast first and i deleted it when it was L.51. I don't like androids that much.
can't live whitout resta http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_razz.gif