PDA

View Full Version : Anyone else?



geewj
May 18, 2004, 06:58 PM
Cause I am -_-

Cowboy
May 18, 2004, 07:00 PM
I'm delicious too. And PWEASE move my last thread to off topic ;_;



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Cowboy on 2004-05-18 17:00 ]</font>

Sef
May 18, 2004, 07:01 PM
Me too Frink. Me too. http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_frown.gif

geewj
May 18, 2004, 07:02 PM
On 2004-05-18 17:00, Cowboy wrote:
And PWEASE move my last thread to off topic ;_;


It is done!

Cowboy
May 18, 2004, 07:04 PM
you kick ass http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif

Kuea
May 18, 2004, 07:05 PM
I am hungry

and I am not copying navi
there is steak being cooked in my house and I am STARVING

Cowboy
May 18, 2004, 07:09 PM
I'm having steak, salad, baked potatoes, potatoe salad, and fried okra.

geewj
May 18, 2004, 07:12 PM
I'm eating a 1 dollar frozen pizza -_-.

How are those crackers Meira?

Pixel_Toa
May 18, 2004, 09:22 PM
Help! Help! I'm stuck to the sticky thread!

HUnewearl_Meira
May 18, 2004, 09:31 PM
On 2004-05-18 17:12, Prof_Frink wrote:

How are those crackers Meira?



Crunchy!

EJ
May 18, 2004, 09:33 PM
This thread is too Sticky it trapping too many in here http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif

Blitzkommando
May 18, 2004, 10:23 PM
Umm... I could use some food myself... Nut wishes would be so nice to have right now...

Solstis
May 18, 2004, 10:30 PM
Nutmeg suXors. http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_razz.gif

Blitzkommando
May 18, 2004, 10:41 PM
On 2004-05-18 20:30, Solstis wrote:
Nutmeg suXors. http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_razz.gif


If you have too much, yes. But in the correct ammounts... nummy...

Outrider
May 19, 2004, 12:11 AM
Nummy?

Guntz348
May 19, 2004, 03:46 AM
I think I'm the only one who knows how he really intended on finishing the sentence... And yes I agree with you Frinky.

Noobliterator
May 19, 2004, 08:41 AM
..................

Kuea
May 19, 2004, 12:24 PM
You made it a sticky?

why?

Mixfortune
May 19, 2004, 01:03 PM
On 2004-05-19 01:46, Guntz348 wrote:
I think I'm the only one who knows how he really intended on finishing the sentence... And yes I agree with you Frinky.



I concur!?

Guntz348
May 20, 2004, 01:56 AM
On 2004-05-19 11:03, Mixfortune wrote:


On 2004-05-19 01:46, Guntz348 wrote:
I think I'm the only one who knows how he really intended on finishing the sentence... And yes I agree with you Frinky.



I concur!?



If you really knew what we were talking about, I really doubt youd concur =/

Mixfortune
May 20, 2004, 10:30 AM
Or do I?

geewj
May 20, 2004, 10:53 AM
Actually I think mix would concur

Mixfortune
May 20, 2004, 11:31 AM
Or would I?

geewj
May 20, 2004, 12:06 PM
Well lets see if we know or not.

X= What you think

Y= The internal conflict

Z= The subject at hand

ZY=X

Y=X/Z

So if we divide the subject at hand out of what you think (This being the only tru variable) Then we are left with the internal conflict.

Now lets assume that the natural man is evil. So any internal conflict that would occur would be weighed in the favor of evil. And lets assume that the higher chance is the one that happens, making Y a constant in favor of Evil. We'll now call it E.

So E(evil)=X(what you think)/Z(the subject at hand)

Now lets issolate what you think again

EZ=X

Evil x The subject at hand would mean the most evil possible outcome of the subject at hand which mathimaticaly proven, is what you would think. Now, if we know what you would think then I, and 9 out of 10 dentists agree, can safely say that you would concur with the sbject at hand.

Scejntjynahl
May 20, 2004, 12:16 PM
On 2004-05-20 10:06, Prof_Frink wrote:
Well lets see if we know or not.

X= What you think

Y= The internal conflict

Z= The subject at hand

ZY=X

Y=X/Z

So if we divide the subject at hand out of what you think (This being the only tru variable) Then we are left with the internal conflict.

Now lets assume that the natural man is evil. So any internal conflict that would occur would be weighed in the favor of evil. And lets assume that the higher chance is the one that happens, making Y a constant in favor of Evil. We'll now call it E.

So E(evil)=X(what you think)/Z(the subject at hand)

Now lets issolate what you think again

EZ=X

Evil x The subject at hand would mean the most evil possible outcome of the subject at hand which mathimaticaly proven, is what you would think. Now, if we know what you would think then I, and 9 out of 10 dentists agree, can safely say that you would concur with the sbject at hand.



Whose hand?

geewj
May 20, 2004, 12:28 PM
That's privleged information

Mixfortune
May 20, 2004, 01:07 PM
But the next subquestion is: are you a dentist?

Outrider
May 20, 2004, 01:57 PM
And if so, can I get an appointment for next Tuesday?

navci
May 20, 2004, 02:01 PM
So, how was the sentence supposed to finish anyway?