Question Ahoy

[Sayara]

Any posts after this one will earn a warning.

This the infamous Verbal Lock... What would happen if you accidentally Double Post... would you get Warning +2? http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif

[Mixfortune]

I assume the same thing that happens if you bump two old topics at the same time before a warning. You would get a single warning. Of course, there aren't always set actions. There can be a number of different circumstances that can change the situation, as well as appropriate actions.

Now, here's a question semi-related to what you've asked. If someone posts within the same minute as a Verbal Lock, but it appears after (if it was not intentional, as they were posting as the Verbal Lock was in affect), would action against them still be taken? If that sort of thing hapened to me I would try and delete my post right away anyways, but I'm wondering what the action for such a situation would be.

[Sayara]

We oughta ask Cap'n Frink bout that... Since he should know! He's a Mod!

[Daikarin]

The real question is, what kind of hell on earth would exist if Frink did a verbal lock on "The person above me thread"?

Tact would have traumas!

http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_disapprove.gif

[Mixfortune]

On 2004-07-23 17:57, Even_Jin wrote:
The real question is, what kind of hell on earth would exist if Frink did a verbal lock on "The person above me thread"?

Tact would have traumas!

http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_disapprove.gif



Well, consdering you don't Verbal Lock a thread in a board that you moderate in...

[Tact]

Actually...I'd probably notice...

[Solstis]

Well, we all know those that double post in verbal locked topics get sent to... Ar.. Ark...

*dart hits Solstis in the neck, knocking him out*

[Mixfortune]

On 2004-07-23 18:01, Solstis wrote:
Well, we all know those that double post in verbal locked topics get sent to... Ar.. Ark...

*dart hits Solstis in the neck, knocking him out*



Members don't go there. Threads do.

[geewj]

Your warning count doesnt realy mean anything. It's just a general rule of thumb. If you're annoying enouhg then you can get banned on two or even one.

[Sayara]

Hmm.. i remember when eRUPT did it once to somebody...

And exactly HOW do you mod heads know how many Warnings each memeber has? Is it a hidden count on each member that only Mod/Admin can see or something?

[Mixfortune]

On 2004-07-23 18:07, Tingle wrote:
Hmm.. i remember when eRUPT did it once to somebody...

And exactly HOW do you mod heads know how many Warnings each memeber has? Is it a hidden count on each member that only Mod/Admin can see or something?



I was usually under the impression that members have a thread with a topic named after them on the God Board.

[Solstis]

On 2004-07-23 18:10, Mixfortune wrote:

On 2004-07-23 18:07, Tingle wrote:
Hmm.. i remember when eRUPT did it once to somebody...

And exactly HOW do you mod heads know how many Warnings each memeber has? Is it a hidden count on each member that only Mod/Admin can see or something?



I was usually under the impression that members have a thread with a topic named after them on the God Board.



Actually, eRUPT stores them all. Robot, after all.

[geewj]

All three of you are right. I'm not kidding.

[Scejntjynahl]

On 2004-07-23 19:22, Prof_Frink wrote:
All three of you are right. I'm not kidding.



Yes he is definetely not kidding.

[Kadavreski]

On 2004-07-23 17:57, Tingle wrote:
We oughta ask Cap'n Frink bout that... Since he should know! He's god!