Originally Posted by
Anduril
(The following are my general thoughts and ramblings regarding POV in regards to short-form writing, and is in no way directly an address of or reaction to anyone's writings in particular)
In the form of a short side-story, as Zorafim mentioned, I would personally argue that asking the reader to step into the shoes of a character is a great way to build a deeper understanding of that character, even more so when that character is a reflection of the writer. You can probably blame my years of literary analysis coursework, but I always find it hard to trust first- and third-person narration when it comes to personal stories since either narrator likely has an agenda. The former will likely try to obscure things that reflect poorly on them or to reshape events in a way that favors their narrative, while the latter, even if they are not a "character" in-and-of themselves, always brings the question of why this disembodied voice has chosen to focus on these events and these characters; when it comes to smaller character-driven pieces, these perspectives can lead to more "telling" instead of "showing" the kind of personality the character has. In a short piece, second-person can give the right balance of detached and personal since it is usually more in the moment and reactionary thus potentially allowing the reader to more strongly identify with the character they have stepped into the shoes of. Again, all just my personal opinion tainted by my love of the unusual nature of second-person narration.
All this is making me want to go back and try working some of my abandoned writing projects...
Connect With Us