hunewearls ata

[SStrikerR]

if any of u like hunewearls, but u think their ata sucks, so u dont use them or u deleted them? well, at 200 with their ata maxed, they arent bad, only 1 behind humar's ata maxed. humar=200 ata, hunewearl=199 ata.

[Banish]

I don't think they suck...ATA isn't that much of a problem-yet.

[DC_PLAYER]

hunewearls are hunter class, wich means they use blades, blades have more atp and ata then the guns wich rangers can use.
so theres not really a problem hitting things

[Weeaboolits]

I've never had a problem with them, and I use mechguns and slicers a lot. ;]

[Ketchup345]

On 2007-05-23 14:43, DC_PLAYER wrote:
hunewearls are hunter class, wich means they use blades, blades have more atp and ata then the guns wich rangers can use.
so theres not really a problem hitting things
Item comparison shows guns as the majority of ATA leaders for the GC/XBox versions.

[DC_PLAYER]

but i'm refering to normal weapons not uber rares and stuff
compare a gladius and a raygun for example

[burning_card]

who the hell would be using a gladius with a huney at higher levels? Or a ranger with a raygun. Varistas and DB's are better then those.

[SStrikerR]

anyway, im getting the feeling u think that i think they're bad. im not, but recently ive seen 1 or 2 topics.......and people are getting rid of there hunewearls cause of some idiot.

[mountainlion]

HUnewearls MST is higher than HUmar plus she can cast Shifta/Deband. HUmar cannot. I have a HUnewearl and I won't re-create her. She does miss alot with her guns, but she eventually hits. But she's a Hunter. Not a ranger.