pokemon

[Zorafim]

On 2007-09-21 09:05, Mysterious-G wrote:
The second one is my lovely "Kyrlia", which is harassed cause of her name and hair, which makes her similiar to Kirlia, a Pokemon:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/it/c/ce/281_Kirlia.png http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif



That isn't a bad thing. Remember that it evolves into the most badass pokémon evar.


Notice: This topic was originally part of PSU Phashion Thread #4. Style > Power (http://www.pso-world.com/viewtopic.php?forum=20&topic=154012)

[-Ryuki-]

There's two things it evolves into. Gardevoir and that new one, who's name escapes me.

[PJ]

Gallade.

Who is more badass, although... neither are QUITE that badass

Add that to the list of disagreements http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif

[-Ryuki-]

That's mainly because~

Lucario > Gallade

>.>;

[Zorafim]

I never played the new game, so I don't know anything about it. It's exactly the same as the three games before it, right?
Either way, I like the concept behind both Pokémon. With all the cute and evil pokémon they have, it's about time they have a holy one.

[Weeaboolits]

http://i177.photobucket.com/albums/w226/MetalBurstz/133_Eevee.png

Everyone knows Eevee is the best one. http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif

[AlexCraig]

http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_lol.gif I stopped with pokémon at second gen. Just felt like there were too many pokémon and the stories got uninteresting to me.

[Zorafim]

Was I that off topic?

[sweetguy117]

i think celeby and lucario are the best

[Weeaboolits]

I saw the fourth pokemon movie, I stopped liking celebi after that. http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_disapprove.gif

[PJ]

I thought the mods deleted our posts, but I guess they did this instead.

...why? http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_disapprove.gif

[Weeaboolits]

Because they want to talk about Pokémon, obviously.

[BlaizeYES]

the mods didnt delete this topic because they know that pokemon was the biggest thing to hit our homes since the tomagotchis.

i miss my tomagotchi named boo boo, he grew to be the one that looked like an oddly fat cat, and evolved when i left him at home to see the movie "men in black" at the star southfield in dearborn, michigan. upon coming home, i saw him evolved into that wonderously gorgeous figure. and then it hit me:

the entire time, the tomagotchi knew that i wanted the fat cat named boo boo, but i was in danger of having it evolve into another form. but i was lucky: it evolved the right way so i could continue loving it, but only after i neglected it.


the moral of the story is that if you want your children to be successful, you must ignore their needs for attention and let them blossom naturally with no adult supervision or guidance

[Banish]

Mew pawns.

[Shadowpawn]

On 2007-09-28 05:22, BlaizeYES wrote:
the mods didnt delete this topic because they know that pokemon was the biggest thing to hit our homes since the tomagotchis.

i miss my tomagotchi named boo boo, he grew to be the one that looked like an oddly fat cat, and evolved when i left him at home to see the movie "men in black" at the star southfield in dearborn, michigan. upon coming home, i saw him evolved into that wonderously gorgeous figure. and then it hit me:

the entire time, the tomagotchi knew that i wanted the fat cat named boo boo, but i was in danger of having it evolve into another form. but i was lucky: it evolved the right way so i could continue loving it, but only after i neglected it.


the moral of the story is that if you want your children to be successful, you must ignore their needs for attention and let them blossom naturally with no adult supervision or guidance



Even though I think you're being sarcastic, you have a point. The Philadelphia Magazine did an article on how parents tend to be TOO involved in their children's lives and arrived to your conclusion. I'll post what they said when I get back from campus.

[omegapirate2k]

Everyone who faces my gallade dies.

Right Rizen and Van Halen?

[BlaizeYES]

On 2007-09-28 08:59, Shadowpawn wrote:

Even though I think you're being sarcastic, you have a point. The Philadelphia Magazine did an article on how parents tend to be TOO involved in their children's lives and arrived to your conclusion. I'll post what they said when I get back from campus.



actually i wasnt being all that sarcastic with my moral of the story, theres some truth to it.

its one of the main downsides of america today, if want your kids thinking they are living their life like the show "laguna beach" or "the hills" and think that because the parents have money that there is no reason to develop any sort of independence, then they are doomed for failure.

now i know theres some cases where people go on to be successful being spoiled rotten, but it happens rarely where a kid will reach their fullest potential while being babied and directed by their parents. the only way to truely live is to have to learn to survive first. the dependence that parents put their children under without having to learn the basics of living are only going to burden the kids in the long run.

thats normally when you get the kids that just graduate college, have a degree in communications just because they needed to choose a major, and then end up sitting on it for years to come and end up working a mediocre job, crying about how "society has screwed them." had they been thinking for themselves and followed their own path, they could have found a career path that would have satisfied any sort of "dream" they could have had for themselves. but in highschool and the few years following, the people that create "drama" are usually the ones that are "very in touch with their feelings," and normally they are "in touch with their feelings" because they get bored of not having responsibility or actual life situations that are going to be relevant going into their mid 20s-rest of their life.


i am glad i helped turn pokemon into a discussion of how children should be raised lol. brilliant. but if you find the article, post it up so i can sneak a peek at the study of parenting

[VanHalen]

On 2007-09-28 08:59, omegapirate2k wrote:
Everyone who faces my gallade dies.

Right Rizen and Van Halen?




>_>

<_<

What about my Torterra? =3

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: VanHalen on 2007-09-28 19:19 ]</font>

[Shadowpawn]

On 2007-09-28 12:49, BlaizeYES wrote:

On 2007-09-28 08:59, Shadowpawn wrote:

Even though I think you're being sarcastic, you have a point. The Philadelphia Magazine did an article on how parents tend to be TOO involved in their children's lives and arrived to your conclusion. I'll post what they said when I get back from campus.



actually i wasnt being all that sarcastic with my moral of the story, theres some truth to it.

its one of the main downsides of america today, if want your kids thinking they are living their life like the show "laguna beach" or "the hills" and think that because the parents have money that there is no reason to develop any sort of independence, then they are doomed for failure.

now i know theres some cases where people go on to be successful being spoiled rotten, but it happens rarely where a kid will reach their fullest potential while being babied and directed by their parents. the only way to truely live is to have to learn to survive first. the dependence that parents put their children under without having to learn the basics of living are only going to burden the kids in the long run.

thats normally when you get the kids that just graduate college, have a degree in communications just because they needed to choose a major, and then end up sitting on it for years to come and end up working a mediocre job, crying about how "society has screwed them." had they been thinking for themselves and followed their own path, they could have found a career path that would have satisfied any sort of "dream" they could have had for themselves. but in highschool and the few years following, the people that create "drama" are usually the ones that are "very in touch with their feelings," and normally they are "in touch with their feelings" because they get bored of not having responsibility or actual life situations that are going to be relevant going into their mid 20s-rest of their life.


i am glad i helped turn pokemon into a discussion of how children should be raised lol. brilliant. but if you find the article, post it up so i can sneak a peek at the study of parenting



Found it online, don't feel like typing it out.

http://www.phillymag.com/articles/bad_parents/

While I do agree that a lot of parents tend to over parent their children I don't think you should leave everything to the child on their own. Some of them DO need some guidance...just don't pre-plan their lives for them.

[BlaizeYES]

yes, well i agree, some kids need guidance, but often times the guidance is horribly applied. kids that are often under strict parenting and follow a predetermined path typically will have self-confidence problems that root from dependence that will only continue throughout life. i say "encourage independence," but if not applied right, the kid could end up being some annoying shithead that just tries to gain the attention of people, or interpret his "independence" as neglect and feel as if nobody loves him. its a fine line, and tomorrow morning im going to give that article a read, its too long and i am about to fall asleep now

[Mysterious-G]

How couldn't I notice that topic?! http://www.pso-world.com/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_wacko.gif
My Absol would lacerate all off you!