PDA

View Full Version : Jury acquits R. Kelly of all counts



eXo
Jun 13, 2008, 04:07 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080613/ap_en_ot/r_kelly_trial


1 hour, 14 minutes ago

CHICAGO - R. Kelly was acquitted of all charges Friday after less than a day of deliberations in his child pornography trial, ending a six-year ordeal for the R&B superstar. ADVERTISEMENT



Kelly dabbed his face with a handkerchief and hugged each of his four attorneys after the verdict — not guilty on all 14 counts — was read. The Grammy award-winning singer had faced 15 years in prison if convicted.

Minutes later, surrounded by bodyguards, he left the courthouse without comment. Dozens of fans screamed and cheered as he climbed into a waiting SUV.

Prosecutors had argued that a video tape mailed to the Chicago Sun-Times in 2002 showed Kelly engaged in graphic sex acts with a girl as young as 13 at the time. Both Kelly, 41, and the now 23-year-old alleged victim had denied they were the ones on the tape. Neither testified during the trial.

The prosecution's star witness was a woman who said she engaged in three-way sex with Kelly and the alleged victim. Defense attorneys argued the man on the tape didn't have a large mole on his back; Kelly has such a mole.

The monthlong trial centered on whether Kelly was the man who appears on a sexually graphic, 27-minute videotape at the heart of the case, and whether a female who also appears on it was underage.

Over seven days presenting their case, prosecutors called 22 witnesses, including several childhood friends of the alleged victim and four of her relatives who identified her as the female on the video.

In just two days, Kelly's lawyers called 12 witnesses. They included three relatives of the alleged victim who testified they did not recognize her as the female on the tape.

Kelly won a Grammy in 1997 for "I Believe I Can Fly," and is known for such raunchy hits as "Bump N' Grind," "Ignition," and for "Trapped in the Closet," a multipart saga about the sexual secrets of an ever-expanding cast of characters.

Of the 12 jurors, nine were men and three were women; eight were white and four were black. They included the wife of a Baptist preacher from Kelly's Chicago-area hometown, Olympia Fields, as well as a compliance officer for a Chicago investment firm and a man in his 60s who emigrated from then-Communist Romania nearly 40 years ago.

Despite his legal troubles, Kelly — who rose from poverty on Chicago's South Side to become a star singer, songwriter and producer — still retains a huge following, and his popularity has arguably grown in recent years.

The singer has released more than half a dozen albums, most of them selling over a million copies. He's also had a multitude of hits and gone on tours. Kelly has a new song, "Hair Braider," out now, and is due to release a new album in July.

Kelly, always meticulously dressed in a suit and tie, appeared tense at times during the trial, furrowing his brow. He seemed particularly ill at ease when prosecutors played the sex tape in open court after opening arguments.

In the video, entered into evidence as "People's Exhibit No. 1," a man has sex with a young female, who is naked for most of the recording. She is often blank-faced. The man speaks to her in a hushed voice, and she calls him "Daddy."

In one scene, alluded to in one count of the indictment, the man urinates on the female.

The issue of whether there was or wasn't a fingernail-sized mole on the man's lower was a subject of hours of testimony. A defense witness told jurors there was no mole on his back, proving it's not Kelly, who has such a mole. But a prosecution witness displayed freeze frames of the video where a dark spot seemed to appear as the man turns to take off his pants.

One surreal moment came when a defense expert played a segment of the tape he doctored showing two headless bodies engaging in sex. The defense said that backed their argument that Kelly's likeness could have been computer-generated.

Cross examination was often heated. Several witnesses cried on the stand.

The star prosecution witness, Lisa Van Allen, became teary eyed as she told jurors she engaged in several three-way sexual encounters with Kelly and the alleged victim, including once on a basketball court. Kelly videotaped the trysts, she said.

Van Allen also claimed Kelly used to carry a duffel bag stuffed full of his homemade sex tapes.

The defense called several witnesses in a bid to discredit Van Allen, accusing her of trying to extort money from Kelly. Under cross-examination, Van Allen admitted she once stole Kelly's $20,000 diamond-studded watch from a hotel.

___

PhotonDrop
Jun 13, 2008, 04:10 PM
I loved that episode of the Boondocks.

Zantra
Jun 13, 2008, 04:12 PM
Yay! More "Trapped in the Closet".

Nitro Vordex
Jun 13, 2008, 04:17 PM
Why the hell wasn't the WOMAN charged with underage sex? WTF?

Also:

Of the 12 jurors, nine were men and three were women; eight were white and four were black. They included the wife of a Baptist preacher from Kelly's Chicago-area hometown, Olympia Fields, as well as a compliance officer for a Chicago investment firm and a man in his 60s who emigrated from then-Communist Romania nearly 40 years ago.
Why is that in there? :???:

Toadthroat
Jun 13, 2008, 04:39 PM
Why the hell wasn't the WOMAN charged with underage sex? WTF?

Also:

Why is that in there? :???:

To show that the jury was unbiased.

SubstanceD
Jun 13, 2008, 05:02 PM
I'm not quite sure what to make of the R. Kelly trial. Like most people, I am a fan of his music ( the guy has made some very memorable songs ). I've tried to avoid the stories about his personal life and just focus on his artistic contributions to the music indurstry but it has been very hard to ignore this one.

To be honest, for a while there it was looking very bad for R. Kelly so I am a bit surprised to hear how the trial ended.

Toadthroat
Jun 13, 2008, 05:10 PM
I stopped caring about R.Kelly a while ago, the trial AND his music. Dude hasn't made a good album since Chocolate Factory (which, admittedly, was a great R&B album). He's way too pop and mainstream now. Like, how many times is dude gunna make a song about how he be up in da club like EEEEEEEEEEEEEY?
He's a joke now.

Nitro Vordex
Jun 13, 2008, 06:17 PM
I Believe I Can Fly.

One of the best. Songs. Ever.

Omega_Weltall
Jun 13, 2008, 06:26 PM
WAT?! you mean to tell me that this fucking pedo got off (and i don't mean on the 14 year old)?!
I guess he had the best defense MONEY CAN BUY! I mean really,WHAT THE FUCK! THIS ASSHOLE MARRIED ALLYAH WHEN SHE WAS 14! FOUR FUCKING TEEN! THIS GUY NEEDS TO BE ON HOW TO CATCH A PREDATOR! I don't care how well this mother fucker can sing HES A SEXUAL DEVIANT! Just goes to show that in the American Justice System: Politicians>Celebrities>Rich People>YOU!

Toadthroat
Jun 13, 2008, 08:46 PM
They say he wasn't even in the video, though I've never seen it myself. I admit the guy has some issues but I don't think its that serious.
Sex with a 14 year old is pretty low on my list of "Bad things you just don't do". I mean, a 14 year old is old enough to know what sex is, the consequences of sex, and who she wants to have sex with.

Nitro Vordex
Jun 13, 2008, 09:07 PM
I have a question, why did it take 8(or so) years for the "victim" in this case to come forward?

Toadthroat
Jun 13, 2008, 11:20 PM
WELCOME TO THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM.

Shadowpawn
Jun 14, 2008, 12:07 AM
Kinda knew this was going to happen.

Kylie
Jun 14, 2008, 12:12 AM
Kinda knew this was going to happen.
Me too. But I haven't followed up on it, and I don't care enough to give an opinion on whether or not I think he's guilty. Although, I do think having sex with a fourteen year old is pretty sick (if he did do it). It's been a while since I was that age, but I don't think I was ready for sex then... even though I probably thought I was.

RuneLateralus
Jun 14, 2008, 01:08 AM
Thank you judicial system for letting another celebrity off easy. Cause they have it so hard.

eXo
Jun 14, 2008, 03:39 AM
Kinda knew this was going to happen.


Question:Did he do it?
Answer: In my opinion YES

Question: Was justice served?
Answer: Yes

The way that i see it their our a few cases where 14-16 year olds are trialed as adults. If so one of that age can be held accountable for their actions then it has to be played across the board it was clearly a case of consensual sex.


I dont support or condon this kind of activity but i agree with this verdict for the most part.

Raine_Loire
Jun 14, 2008, 09:41 AM
I have a question, why did it take 8(or so) years for the "victim" in this case to come forward?

I don't think she actually did. She said it wasn't her in the video, and that it wasn't him.

I think this is a really hazy part of the system- underage sex- I mean if it's wrong for a teenager to have sex, why can they do it with each OTHER? I can see in school cases, or work- stuff where the kid might feel intimidated, but IDK- if it's consensual, and neither party is complaining... why was the legal system involved at all?

Shadowpawn
Jun 14, 2008, 11:13 AM
I don't think she actually did. She said it wasn't her in the video, and that it wasn't him.

I think this is a really hazy part of the system- underage sex- I mean if it's wrong for a teenager to have sex, why can they do it with each OTHER? I can see in school cases, or work- stuff where the kid might feel intimidated, but IDK- if it's consensual, and neither party is complaining... why was the legal system involved at all?

Because if the system wasn't involved at all it sends a message to society that it is okay for minors and adults to engage in sex. Most minors are impulsive and while they may know the consequences of sex they still are far to young to be able to cope with them independently. Thus this causes a unnecessary burden for society to deal with. Unlike sex between minors the chances of getting STD are much higher for sex between a minor and a adult due to the adult being much more experienced (in most cases). Not to mentioned that the adult could also make the minor dependent on them mentality, financially or physically thus making the once consensual agreement a one sided affair.

Also, I think it's just wrong for a 20 or 30 man or woman to engage in sex with a minor because there's no relationship that can grow from that, it's just mindless sex. As rational thinking beings we should strive to move beyond that type of behavior.

Raine_Loire
Jun 14, 2008, 03:42 PM
Also, I think it's just wrong for a 20 or 30 man or woman to engage in sex with a minor because there's no relationship that can grow from that, it's just mindless sex. As rational thinking beings we should strive to move beyond that type of behavior.

That's not completely true. There's a difference minor (under 18) and adolescent (12-14) yes there is no future with a 20 year old and a 12 year old (you hope anyway) but there are successful relationships between people in their 20s and minors.