PDA

View Full Version : My Complaints About Sega.



Aisha379
Sep 4, 2009, 10:19 PM
As much as some people may disagree with the following observations, I stand firmly by them. Here's my side of the story: Sega wants nothing other than absolute ideological and moral lockdown. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: Sega contends that governments should have the right to lie to their own subjects or to other governments and that, therefore, there's no difference between normal people like you and me and crotchety beatniks. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces gin-swilling degenerates (as distinct from the abusive, heartless doomsday prophets who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that Sega is entitled to rifle, pillage, plunder, and loot. In reality, contrariwise, we must stop tiptoeing and begin marching boldly and forthrightly towards our goal, which is to advance freedom in countries strangled by tyranny. We must punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that Sega's ultimata represent a new frightful ethos that nugatory delinquents will eventually use to lower our standard of living. I'll say that again because I want it to sink in: We must not miss our chance to appeal not to the contented and satisfied, but embrace those tormented by suffering, those without peace, the unhappy and the discontented.

We need to educate others about the criticisms and complaints of wretched mob bosses. But you knew that already. So let me add that I want to see all of us working together to resolve a number of lingering problems. Yes, this is an idealistic approach to actualizing our restorative goals. Nevertheless, you should realize that Sega's advocates are merely ciphers. Sega is the one who decides whether or not to inflict untold misery, suffering, and distress. Sega is the one who gives out the orders to mock, ridicule, deprecate, and objurgate people for their religious beliefs. And Sega is the one trying to conceal how we must oppose evil wherever it rears its eccentric, otiose head. If we fail then all of our sacrifices and all of the dreams and sacrifices of our ancestors will have been in vain. The key is to realize that if the only way to denounce those who claim that Sega's activities are on the up-and-up is for me to jump in the lake, then so be it. It would indubitably be worth it because there is no place in this country where we are safe from its confreres, who are legion, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack.

Need I point out that Sega is opposed to snobbism, even though its own outbursts are just as upside-down, inside-out, convoluted, inverted, and perverted? At first blush, it appears that Sega's factotums are cut from the same mold as disorganized porn stars. However, Sega has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. It can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches Sega's nostrils, it'll start talking about the joy of wowserism and how scabrous gasbags aren't ever biggety. As you listen to Sega's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice its hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that it thinks it would be a great idea to ridicule, parody, censor, and downgrade opposing ideas. Even if we overlook the logistical impossibilities of such an idea, the underlying premise is still flawed.

You'd think I'd be pretty well inured by now to the lunacies of Sega's hastily mounted campaigns, but I have to say that there is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Sega's essays from the first word to the last. In effect, throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to take action and those who wish to concoct labels for people, objects, and behaviors in order to manipulate the public's opinion of them. Naturally, Sega belongs to the latter category. All of these things are related: insurrectionism, Sega's memoirs, and the general breakdown of our society. I'll even tell you how they're related. It's really very simple. In essence, I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to tell Sega where it can stick it. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why Sega decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that it fears because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility.

Sega accuses me of being grotesque whenever I state that we need the space and autonomy to fight the adages that hurt us. All right, I'll admit that I have a sharp tongue and sometimes write with a bit of a poison pen but the fact remains that with Sega so forcefully causing riots in the streets, things are starting to come to a head. That's why we must disabuse it of the notion that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully. As a practical matter, Sega uses its victim status as a kind of magic incantation to stifle debate, disparage critical analysis, and persuade us that it could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: What is it about our society that makes larcenous saboteurs like Sega desire to defy the rules of logic? To help answer that question I will offer a single anecdote. A few weeks ago, I overheard some shrewish swindler tell everyone who passed by that divine ichor flows through Sega's veins. Astounded, I asked this person if he realized that Sega thinks nothing of violating the spirit of an indigenous people whose art and songs and way of life are proof that Sega's cheerleaders are disruptive, covinous pop psychologists (literally!). Not only was his answer "no" but it was also news to him that there is a problem here. A very large, capricious, slaphappy problem.

To be blunt, what I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of a nefarious wacko. It's a fact. Does anyone believe Sega's claim that it has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring itself to help disseminate the True Faith of ruffianism? Come on, anyone? Like I thought, I once overheard Sega say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? Sega said that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt take us all on a completely reckless ride into the unknown". Can you believe that? At least Sega's statement made me realize that this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact.

In case you hadn't noticed, I hate it when people get their facts totally wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how prætorianism is a viable and vital objective for our nation's educational institutions, I can't help but think that Sega seeks scapegoats for its own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target it can find, that is, confused, malicious fugitives. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe Sega acts in the public interest. Admittedly, that's about as likely as Elvis materializing in my room tonight and singing Heartbreak Hotel. Still, the possibility does help one realize that everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that we must get beyond name-calling. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche.

Sega will probably never understand why it scares me so much. And it indeed does scare me: Its effusions are scary, its ipse dixits are scary, and most of all, when it says that everyone who scrambles aboard the Sega bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride, in its mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like it believes it has said something very profound. If you'll allow me a minor dysphemism, one task that rests on all of our shoulders is to rake Sega over the coals for preventing me from sleeping soundly at night. Or, to phrase that a little more politely, if we take Sega's analects to their logical conclusion, we see that sooner than you think, Sega will slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass.

If you observe some repetition in my statements, it is because such repetition is needed for clarity and emphasis as I take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on Sega's unbridled obloquies. You're probably thinking, "I challenge Sega to admit it was wrong and thereby begin the healing process." Well, you're right. But something else you should know is that people used to think I was exaggerating whenever I said that it has managed to elude any direct ties to specific acts of negligence—no small feat considering its history. After seeing Sega create division in the name of diversity these same people now realize that I wasn't exaggerating at all. In fact, they even realize that I frequently talk about how Sega's subordinates fight more for the negative destruction of opposing ideologies than for the positive promotion of their own. I would drop the subject except that if I hear its adherents say, "Everything is happy and fine and good" one more time, I'm doubtlessly going to throw up. In Sega's asseverations, clericalism is witting and unremitting, vexatious and reprehensible. It revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to take away what few freedoms we have left.

Some people think that Sega is determined to put as little thought as possible into solving the undeniable problems that our society is still facing with regard to racism. Others believe that we are becoming a nation of moonstruck, incontinent ideologues. The truth lies somewhere in between, namely, that I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes organizations like it want to represent Heaven as Hell and, conversely, the most wretched life as paradise. Sega wants me to stop trying to focus on concrete facts, on hard news, on analyzing and interpreting what's happening in the world. Instead, it'd rather I swallow whatever it dishes out. Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily. Accordingly, Sega has hatched all sorts of puerile plans. Remember its attempt to lead us, lemminglike, over the precipice of self-destruction? No? That's because Sega's so good at concealing its mutinous activities. I would like to end on a heartfelt note. Sega's bootlickers don't see the chaos that will be unleashed if they get their way and spawn a society in which those with the most deviant lifestyle, dictatorial behavior, or personal failures are given the most by the government.

Rasputin
Sep 4, 2009, 10:28 PM
COOL STORY BROOOOOOOO

Kylie
Sep 4, 2009, 10:31 PM
Ugh. Although you make a few decent points, you're coming off as a pretentious jerk. :disapprove: I mean, c'mon, it's just a game; no need to take it so seriously.

Retehi
Sep 4, 2009, 10:33 PM
words words words

Aisha379
Sep 4, 2009, 10:33 PM
*sigh* I'll try to make this shorter for you more mentally challenged individuals.


Here's the angry letter Sega knew it was bound to receive. In the rest of this letter, I will use history and science (in the Hegelian sense) to prove that Sega's torchbearers want so much to provide cover for a nefarious agenda that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. Sega shouldn't delegitimize our belief systems and replace them with a counter-hegemony that seeks to render unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions diminish society's inducements to good behavior.

I have a message for Sega. My message is that, for the good of us all, it should never get everyone to march in lockstep with its beastly-to-the-core cat's-paws. It should never even try to do such a backwards thing. To make myself perfectly clear, by "never", I don't mean "maybe", "sometimes", or "it depends". I mean only that Sega's behavior might be different if it were told that its operatives don't want to make their own decisions but want Sega to do their thinking for them. Of course, as far as it's concerned, this fact will fall into the category of, "My mind is made up; don't confuse me with the facts." That's why I'm telling you that we cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must get people to sign a petition to limit Sega's ability to cause trouble. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that if we can understand what has caused the current plague of the most craven airheads you'll ever see, I believe that we can then attack Sega's malice and hypocrisy. So, sorry for being so long-winded in this letter, but I have an inveterate hatred of Sega.

Lance813
Sep 4, 2009, 10:37 PM
Don't like the game/service then don't play it.

Aisha379
Sep 4, 2009, 10:38 PM
I don't anymore, actually. Now that I've been exposed to PSU's shenanigans I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps PSU's secret police often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear. In closing, PSU's spin doctors are profoundly influenced by what PSU says and does.

Lance813
Sep 4, 2009, 10:39 PM
Wait for FF14. That should be fun.

Aisha379
Sep 4, 2009, 10:41 PM
Wait for FF14. That should be fun.


I have had enough of Square! Permit me this forum to rant. Square's advocates want to use rock music, with its savage, tribal, orgiastic beat, to exploit other cultures for self-entertainment for one purpose and one purpose only: to remove society's moral barriers and allow perversion to prosper.

Square demands that we make a choice. Either we let it make the pot of collectivism overboil and scald the whole world or it'll break our country's national and patriotic backbone and make it ripe for the slave's yoke of international ruffianism. This "choice" exemplifies what is commonly known as a "false dichotomy" or "the fallacy of the excluded middle" because it denies other alternatives, such as that Square's votaries hand over the country to purblind ninnies, as though it were a disgrace to give the needy a helping hand as opposed to an elbow in the face. I won't dwell on that except to direct your attention to the drossy manner in which it has been trying to nail people to trees. Once, just once, I'd like to see Square's trucklers deal stiffly with the most power-hungry pamphleteers I've ever seen who make it virtually impossible to fire incompetent workers. But until they do that (if they ever do that), we must realize that Square takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on it. It also ignores all of the evidence that doesn't support (or in many cases directly contradicts) its position. Square must have known that its witticisms would cause high levels of outrage and would generate many letters in response (like this one). The reason is clear. By excluding any possibility of comparison, Square can easily pass off its own ventures as works of genius. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Square keeps stating over and over again that no one is smart enough to see through its transparent lies. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground—facts such as that Square speaks like a true defender of the status quo—a status quo, we should not forget, that enables it to discredit legitimate voices in the antidisestablishmentarianism debate.

Rust
Sep 4, 2009, 10:48 PM
Wait, wait, wait.

You really don't have anything better to do than addressing an inept complaint about Sega that no ones care about? :disapprove:

Aisha379
Sep 4, 2009, 10:50 PM
Wait, wait, wait.

You really don't have anything better to do than addressing an inept complaint about Sega that no ones care about? :disapprove:

Do you have any right to talk to me like that?

From what I know of France's publications, it is saying essentially three things:

1. Men are spare parts in the social repertoire—mere optional extras.
2. All it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la.
3. Embracing a system of Chekism will make everything right with the world.

Obviously, all three of these are undoubtedly obscene.

SStrikerR
Sep 4, 2009, 10:51 PM
Oh fuck yeah, tetsaru #2!
You may have passed Abdur's record for longest "serious" post in pso-w's history. Way to go!

edit: That was fucking out of line, Aisha. you have no right to talk to HIM like that.

Aisha379
Sep 4, 2009, 11:01 PM
Oh fuck yeah, tetsaru #2!
You may have passed Abdur's record for longest "serious" post in pso-w's history. Way to go!

edit: That was fucking out of line, Aisha. you have no right to talk to HIM like that.

What's so great about "HIM", huh?

He extricates himself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice. I, speaking as someone who is not a destructive ignoramus, hope that his punishment fits his crime. I wish I could put it more delicately but that would miss the point. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, I can guarantee the readers of this letter that I don't just want to make a point. I don't just want to speak up and speak out against him. I'm here to give an alternate solution, a better one. I don't just ask rhetorical questions; I have answers. That's why I'm telling you that if I didn't think he would rule with an iron fist, I wouldn't say that the tone of his paroxysms is eerily reminiscent of that of wretched unsympathetic-types of the late 1940s in the sense that the worst classes of inhumane, pugnacious chuckleheads I've ever seen are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the "poeta nascitur, non fit" that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that it would be charitable of me not to mention that I am concerned that He's vague and overly broad definition of "historiographical" will cause crotchety heretics to abandon me on a desert island in a lustrum or two. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity so I will instead maintain that no one likes being attacked by bloody-minded converts to faddism. Even worse, He exploits our fear of those attacks—which he claims will evolve sooner or later into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks—as a pretext to deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that I shall not argue that He's newsgroup postings are an authentic map of his plan to utilize legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to declare martial law, suspend elections, and round up dissidents (i.e., anyone who does not buy his lie that public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't). Read them and see for yourself.

UVERlupend
Sep 4, 2009, 11:49 PM
Look man. I get that u dont like the company. Thats fine, its your opinion. But all this bullshit about Sega as a company? Seriously man, u got a problem with the company, get off yout ass and do something about it instead of ranting and insulting the intelligence of ppl in the provess bro.

Nitro Vordex
Sep 4, 2009, 11:53 PM
I'm sorry, but I refuse to believe you really typed all of that.

Look, I'll read it later and try to understand what you're bleeding all over. I couldn't even stand to read the first paragraph, it just screamed indexozumasaru.

Rasputin
Sep 4, 2009, 11:57 PM
Wait, what just happened? I don't even... please help me understand what zombies have to do with SEGA.

Nitro Vordex
Sep 5, 2009, 12:07 AM
[spoiler-box]
My complaint about Aisha379

I indisputably hope Aisha379 gives this letter five minutes of its precious cappuccino-sipping, cancer-stick-puffing time. The first thing I want to bring up is that I wouldn't want to undermine the intellectual purpose of higher education. I would, on the other hand, love to argue about Aisha379's hijinks. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. If Aisha379 continues to perpetuate the nonsense known technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. Let's look at the facts. First, Aisha379's degeneracy has permeated the whole stratum of society. Second, Aisha379 is offended by the truth. And finally, Aisha379's stratagems are merely a stalking horse. They mask its secret intention to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that it may be generating.
I would not have thought it possible that Aisha379's left hand doesn't know what its right hand is doing, but it's absolutely true. Please forgive my directness, but if five years ago I had described an organization like Aisha379 to you and told you that in five years it'd interfere with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights, you'd have thought me dissolute. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how I realize that the tone of this letter may be making some people feel uneasy. However, even if you're somewhat uncomfortable reading about Aisha379's condescending maneuvers please don't blame me for them. I'm not the one challenging all I stand for. I'm not the one breaking down our communities. And I'm not the one causing riots in the streets.
Aisha379's latest proposed social programs are particularly intemperate, even by Aisha379's intemperate standards. Let me rephrase that: I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that Aisha379 is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to put our liberties at risk by a dotty and disrespectful rush to instill a subconscious feeling of guilt in those of us who disagree with its modes of thought. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but it can't possibly believe that its smears are our final line of defense against tyrrany. It's spleeny but it's not that spleeny.
I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on Aisha379's part to stretch credulity beyond the breaking point before you know it. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that I have reason to believe that Aisha379 is about to paralyze needed efforts to put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that Aisha379 frequently avers its support of democracy and its love of freedom. But one need only look at what Aisha379 is doing—as opposed to what it is saying—to understand its true aims. I'll repeat what I've already said: I would be grateful if Aisha379 would take a little time from its rigorous schedule to deal with its predatory demands on a case-by-case basis. Of course, pigs will grow wings and fly before that ever happens.
Common-sense understanding of human nature tells us that if Aisha379 had even a shred of intellectual integrity, it'd admit that if we fail to view the realms of materialism and Marxism not as two opposing poles but as two continua, then all of our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead empire. The "decay of that colossal wreck," as the poet Shelley puts it, teaches us that the grossly fallacious reasoning behind Aisha379's insults can be confirmed by some simple fact-checking. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that when Aisha379 says that it has the trappings of deity, that's just a load of spucatum tauri. According to Aisha379, anyone who points this out is guilty of spreading lies, smears, and particularism. And that's all I have to say.[/spoiler-box]


[spoiler-box]http://images.starcraftmazter.net/4chan/for_forums/obvious_troll.jpg[/spoiler-box]


You're good.


But I'm better.

Volcompat321
Sep 5, 2009, 12:20 AM
It's still SEGA, right?

autumn
Sep 5, 2009, 12:21 AM
tl;dr

any of it.

wow fuck.

Volcompat321
Sep 5, 2009, 12:25 AM
Yea, I didn't read anything but the title, and that's all I need.

beatrixkiddo
Sep 5, 2009, 12:42 AM
[spoiler-box]Made you look.[/spoiler-box]

astuarlen
Sep 5, 2009, 12:47 AM
You need to put that in a spoiler box, Bea. :<

Rust
Sep 5, 2009, 08:52 AM
[spoiler-box]
My complaint about Aisha379

I indisputably hope Aisha379 gives this letter five minutes of its precious cappuccino-sipping, cancer-stick-puffing time. The first thing I want to bring up is that I wouldn't want to undermine the intellectual purpose of higher education. I would, on the other hand, love to argue about Aisha379's hijinks. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. If Aisha379 continues to perpetuate the nonsense known technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets. Let's look at the facts. First, Aisha379's degeneracy has permeated the whole stratum of society. Second, Aisha379 is offended by the truth. And finally, Aisha379's stratagems are merely a stalking horse. They mask its secret intention to deny citizens the ability to draw their own conclusions about the potential for violence that it may be generating.
I would not have thought it possible that Aisha379's left hand doesn't know what its right hand is doing, but it's absolutely true. Please forgive my directness, but if five years ago I had described an organization like Aisha379 to you and told you that in five years it'd interfere with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights, you'd have thought me dissolute. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how I realize that the tone of this letter may be making some people feel uneasy. However, even if you're somewhat uncomfortable reading about Aisha379's condescending maneuvers please don't blame me for them. I'm not the one challenging all I stand for. I'm not the one breaking down our communities. And I'm not the one causing riots in the streets.
Aisha379's latest proposed social programs are particularly intemperate, even by Aisha379's intemperate standards. Let me rephrase that: I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that Aisha379 is up to, the more shocking things, things like how it wants to put our liberties at risk by a dotty and disrespectful rush to instill a subconscious feeling of guilt in those of us who disagree with its modes of thought. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but it can't possibly believe that its smears are our final line of defense against tyrrany. It's spleeny but it's not that spleeny.
I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on Aisha379's part to stretch credulity beyond the breaking point before you know it. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that I have reason to believe that Aisha379 is about to paralyze needed efforts to put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that Aisha379 frequently avers its support of democracy and its love of freedom. But one need only look at what Aisha379 is doing—as opposed to what it is saying—to understand its true aims. I'll repeat what I've already said: I would be grateful if Aisha379 would take a little time from its rigorous schedule to deal with its predatory demands on a case-by-case basis. Of course, pigs will grow wings and fly before that ever happens.
Common-sense understanding of human nature tells us that if Aisha379 had even a shred of intellectual integrity, it'd admit that if we fail to view the realms of materialism and Marxism not as two opposing poles but as two continua, then all of our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead empire. The "decay of that colossal wreck," as the poet Shelley puts it, teaches us that the grossly fallacious reasoning behind Aisha379's insults can be confirmed by some simple fact-checking. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that when Aisha379 says that it has the trappings of deity, that's just a load of spucatum tauri. According to Aisha379, anyone who points this out is guilty of spreading lies, smears, and particularism. And that's all I have to say.[/spoiler-box]


[spoiler-box]http://images.starcraftmazter.net/4chan/for_forums/obvious_troll.jpg[/spoiler-box]


You're good.


But I'm better.

Why, Nitro?

WHY?!

Aisha379
Sep 5, 2009, 09:08 AM
Well thank God someone finally caught on *yawn*

Dhylec
Sep 5, 2009, 09:39 AM
Well, I hope the OP enjoyed a little fun with some massive blocks of texts. This topic really belongs in FKL, but I'll leave it here as an example of how Rants is being ridiculed.