PDA

View Full Version : Bush's Nuclear plan



Morfos
May 16, 2003, 08:36 AM
The Nation; Door Opened for New Era of Nuclear Arms; A key Senate panel backs a bill that would end a 10-year ban on research, upgrade the Nevada test site and let the president pursue smaller weapons.

The Los Angeles Times; Los Angeles, Calif.; May 10, 2003; Paul Richter, Times Staff Writer; If you have the LA times you can read the full article.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/334751901.html?did=334751901&FMT=ABS&FMTS=FT&PMID=7683&desc=The+Nation%3b+Door+Opened+for+New+Era+of+Nucl ear+Arms%3b+A+key+Senate+panel+backs+a+bill+that+w ould+end+a+10-year+ban+on+research,+upgrade+the+Nevada+test+site +and+let+the+president+pursue+smaller+weapons.

You will find out that Bush is allowing the construction of smaller nukes, and the nuclear bunker busters.

BlackRose
May 16, 2003, 11:00 AM
...isn't that the same thing you posted earlier, in the thread that was just locked?

Chibi-Chan
May 16, 2003, 01:11 PM
I suppose as long as we have nukes, and other people like Russia and India and Israel etc. everyone else is going to want to have them. In this world, nuclear power is real power. Look at North Korea, they want to become a world power, so they start building nukes. Its a self fufilling proliferation.. I doubt anyone can stop it now, someday it will most certainly lead to all our destruction. What can I say, live every day to the fullest.

TheWhiteShadow
May 16, 2003, 02:39 PM
It's a shame that countries still have to fart around with nuclear fission, when they can spend their time more productively developing the nuclear fusion that everyone says is a myth (It isn't.).

For example, the US wouldn't even have to look in the general direction of the Middle East, if fusion was developed as an alternative to gasoline combustion.

Just my thoughts.

Ness
May 16, 2003, 03:33 PM
Like I said in the last one, the terst will be done using computers. No real bombs will the detonated.

LollipopLolita
May 16, 2003, 05:04 PM
which means it can't possibly account for everything

Aurra
May 16, 2003, 05:08 PM
Holy Jeebus, use the <url=http://www.site.com>text</url> tag! It's there to help in situtations that involve ultra-long URLs! http://www.pso-world.com/psoworld/images/phpbb/icons/smiles/icon_biggrin.gif

Vantamiath
May 16, 2003, 05:21 PM
It applies like children playing with toys.

That kid has one...I WANT ONE

Dangerous55
May 16, 2003, 10:52 PM
On 2003-05-16 06:36, Morfos wrote:
The Nation; Door Opened for New Era of Nuclear Arms; A key Senate panel backs a bill that would end a 10-year ban on research, upgrade the Nevada test site and let the president pursue smaller weapons.

The Los Angeles Times; Los Angeles, Calif.; May 10, 2003; Paul Richter, Times Staff Writer; If you have the LA times you can read the full article.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/334751901.html?did=334751901&FMT=ABS&FMTS=FT&PMID=7683&desc=The+Nation%3b+Door+Opened+for+New+Era+of+Nucl ear+Arms%3b+A+key+Senate+panel+backs+a+bill+that+w ould+end+a+10-year+ban+on+research,+upgrade+the+Nevada+test+site +and+let+the+president+pursue+smaller+weapons.

You will find out that Bush is allowing the construction of smaller nukes, and the nuclear bunker busters.




WHAT?!

NUKE BUSH!

Ness
May 17, 2003, 03:20 PM
On 2003-05-16 20:52, Dangerous55 wrote:


On 2003-05-16 06:36, Morfos wrote:
The Nation; Door Opened for New Era of Nuclear Arms; A key Senate panel backs a bill that would end a 10-year ban on research, upgrade the Nevada test site and let the president pursue smaller weapons.

The Los Angeles Times; Los Angeles, Calif.; May 10, 2003; Paul Richter, Times Staff Writer; If you have the LA times you can read the full article.

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/334751901.html?did=334751901&FMT=ABS&FMTS=FT&PMID=7683&desc=The+Nation%3b+Door+Opened+for+New+Era+of+Nucl ear+Arms%3b+A+key+Senate+panel+backs+a+bill+that+w ould+end+a+10-year+ban+on+research,+upgrade+the+Nevada+test+site +and+let+the+president+pursue+smaller+weapons.

You will find out that Bush is allowing the construction of smaller nukes, and the nuclear bunker busters.




WHAT?!

NUKE BUSH!



I didn't even read the article because it's probably biased, fake, or totally blown out of proportion.

Morfos
May 20, 2003, 06:36 PM
its not.

Dangerous55
May 20, 2003, 07:31 PM
On 2003-05-17 13:20, Ness wrote:




I didn't even read the article because it's probably biased, fake, or totally blown out of proportion.



Nessie my boy, I was joking. Bush rules.

Ness
May 21, 2003, 06:23 AM
On 2003-05-20 17:31, Dangerous55 wrote:


On 2003-05-17 13:20, Ness wrote:




I didn't even read the article because it's probably biased, fake, or totally blown out of proportion.



Nessie my boy, I was joking. Bush rules.



I know. I was just saying.....

Ness
May 21, 2003, 06:24 AM
On 2003-05-20 16:36, Morfos wrote:
its not.



And your proof is......

No offense, but given your credibility I would have to say that is is.