QUOTE OF THE MINUTE

[Saladwood]

"his sentences reek of overthinking simple points just to look smart"

AHAHAHAHA HAHAHAH AH AH AH AH H AH AHAHAHA AH AHAHAA

the person who said it obviously knows who it's about, but who it's about, sadly enough, will probably not know.

[Spy]

On 2002-10-21 23:14, PSOSaladWood wrote:

the person who said it obviously knows who it's about, but who it's about, sadly enough, will probably not know.

You shouldn't confuse yourself like that. It just isn't healthy.

[Saladwood]

On 2002-10-21 23:24, Spy wrote:

On 2002-10-21 23:14, PSOSaladWood wrote:

the person who said it obviously knows who it's about, but who it's about, sadly enough, will probably not know.

You shouldn't confuse yourself like that. It just isn't healthy.

I guess complex (well, it's not really even complex) sentance structure is too complicated for you to grasp just yet.

ROCK!


next quote of the minute: "has to take jabs instead of making sense"

thank you mysterious quote guy!

[Danger_Girl]

Well that was kind of a lame and childish thing to post Wood. After removing Spy's article from the editorials, obviously we are going to assume its about him. Very un-cool.

And even if its not about Spy, its most likely about someone here. Maybe you should set a little better example than this.

[Saladwood]

On 2002-10-21 23:33, Danger_Girl wrote:
Well that was kind of a lame and childish thing to post Wood. After removing Spy's article from the editorials, obviously we are going to assume its about him. Very un-cool.

And even if its not about Spy, its most likely about someone here. Maybe you should set a little better example than this.

I told him not to be egotistical about it having an article posted. He changed his title, which said something that violated that condition.

*yawn*

[ABDUR101]

"OMFG! It just crashed! That cow is going to kick my ass x_X "

[Spy]

On 2002-10-21 23:36, PSOSaladWood wrote:

I told him not to be egotistical about it having an article posted. He changed his title, which said something that violated that condition.

Unlike your article-strike team I don't bark on command. Sorry.

[LollipopLolita]

On 2002-10-21 23:33, Danger_Girl wrote:
Well that was kind of a lame and childish thing to post Wood.

trust me, you and spy haven't been the best example of maturity either

[Saladwood]

On 2002-10-21 23:46, Spy wrote:

Unlike your article-strike team I don't bark on command. Sorry.

[/quote]


Ask anyone on the team.

It's VOLUNTARY.

All I ask is to write on a certain topic.

So, if that's so hard for you to do, and not be arrogant about it, as I requested, then that's YOUR problem, not mine, not the editorial team, not anyone elses.

[LollipopLolita]

On 2002-10-21 23:46, Spy wrote:

Unlike your article-strike team I don't bark on command. Sorry.

spy seriously now, grow up. the world does not revolve to fit you. i am locking this.

don't discredit the hard work of the editorial team.