"his sentences reek of overthinking simple points just to look smart"
AHAHAHAHA HAHAHAH AH AH AH AH H AH AHAHAHA AH AHAHAA
the person who said it obviously knows who it's about, but who it's about, sadly enough, will probably not know.
"his sentences reek of overthinking simple points just to look smart"
AHAHAHAHA HAHAHAH AH AH AH AH H AH AHAHAHA AH AHAHAA
the person who said it obviously knows who it's about, but who it's about, sadly enough, will probably not know.
You shouldn't confuse yourself like that. It just isn't healthy.On 2002-10-21 23:14, PSOSaladWood wrote:
the person who said it obviously knows who it's about, but who it's about, sadly enough, will probably not know.
I guess complex (well, it's not really even complex) sentance structure is too complicated for you to grasp just yet.On 2002-10-21 23:24, Spy wrote:
You shouldn't confuse yourself like that. It just isn't healthy.On 2002-10-21 23:14, PSOSaladWood wrote:
the person who said it obviously knows who it's about, but who it's about, sadly enough, will probably not know.
ROCK!
next quote of the minute: "has to take jabs instead of making sense"
thank you mysterious quote guy!
Well that was kind of a lame and childish thing to post Wood. After removing Spy's article from the editorials, obviously we are going to assume its about him. Very un-cool.
And even if its not about Spy, its most likely about someone here. Maybe you should set a little better example than this.
I told him not to be egotistical about it having an article posted. He changed his title, which said something that violated that condition.On 2002-10-21 23:33, Danger_Girl wrote:
Well that was kind of a lame and childish thing to post Wood. After removing Spy's article from the editorials, obviously we are going to assume its about him. Very un-cool.
And even if its not about Spy, its most likely about someone here. Maybe you should set a little better example than this.
*yawn*
"OMFG! It just crashed! That cow is going to kick my ass x_X "
Look, he did it again.
Unlike your article-strike team I don't bark on command. Sorry.On 2002-10-21 23:36, PSOSaladWood wrote:
I told him not to be egotistical about it having an article posted. He changed his title, which said something that violated that condition.
trust me, you and spy haven't been the best example of maturity eitherOn 2002-10-21 23:33, Danger_Girl wrote:
Well that was kind of a lame and childish thing to post Wood.
Unlike your article-strike team I don't bark on command. Sorry.On 2002-10-21 23:46, Spy wrote:
[/quote]
Ask anyone on the team.
It's VOLUNTARY.
All I ask is to write on a certain topic.
So, if that's so hard for you to do, and not be arrogant about it, as I requested, then that's YOUR problem, not mine, not the editorial team, not anyone elses.
spy seriously now, grow up. the world does not revolve to fit you. i am locking this.On 2002-10-21 23:46, Spy wrote:
Unlike your article-strike team I don't bark on command. Sorry.
don't discredit the hard work of the editorial team.
Connect With Us