Best race for a Wartecher?

[mech259_]

Casts have the best ATA and very high ATP also. They make good hunters.

And any race that's good at being a hunter also makes a good wartecher, because wartechers are pretty much hunters that can heal and use buffs.

(Newmans are very bad hunters.)

[Delinguaniss]

I'm picking human, but wherre the hell are the Cast for this poll?

[happy_cricket]

On 2006-12-17 13:20, jizaboz wrote:
Should a cast really be anything but a Ranger?

Typical meatsack, trying to tell us what we can and can't be. Here's a question... should humans really be anything but planetless slobs?


Oh yeah. I went there.

[ShinMaruku]

On 2006-12-17 13:36, happy_cricket wrote:

On 2006-12-17 13:20, jizaboz wrote:
Should a cast really be anything but a Ranger?

Typical meatsack, trying to tell us what we can and can't be. Here's a question... should humans really be anything but planetless slobs?


Oh yeah. I went there.

As humans are the originators and the template all them planets are their but they ain't goin all Dark Dragon Blade on them...
As for best wartecher, what you want. If ya wnat Cell cast. Want the Hulk, beast, want Arrargon pick Dunedain

[Shiro_Ryuu]

ya, CASTs are good Hunters, but their physical stats are only slightly better than Humans who have better EVP, MST, and TAP(as a Wartecher, you may need it for things such as Tengohgs or other melee-resistant monsters.

[Gojin]

On 2006-12-17 13:21, mech259_ wrote:
Casts have the best ATA and very high ATP also. They make good hunters.

And any race that's good at being a hunter also makes a good wartecher, because wartechers are pretty much hunters that can heal and use buffs.

(Newmans are very bad hunters.)

Newmans are better wartechers, they can also do decent damage with techs, and not get one hitted like foretechers, humans are only average.

[Gamemako]

On 2006-12-17 11:03, -Shimarisu- wrote:
[02:43] <Argus> human male, 50/1, 306 atp, cast male, 50/1, 324 atp really it's negligible.
[02:45] <Argus> uh, 60/10, human=486, cast=513
[02:45] <Argus> it's ziltch.
[02:45] <Argus> plus remeber, you are melee
[02:45] <Argus> humans get much better mst too.
[02:47] <Argus> ata wise 50/1 human=111, 50/1 cast=124
[02:49] <Argus> 60/10 human=169, cast=190

Can't be bothered paring down the IRC quotes. Time for bed.

Human 111, CAST 124. Newman fits in there where? There is an entire race in between those two. I have to be curious.

[DonRoyale]

On 2006-12-17 13:21, mech259_ wrote:
Casts have the best ATA and very high ATP also. They make good hunters.

And any race that's good at being a hunter also makes a good wartecher, because wartechers are pretty much hunters that can heal and use buffs.

(Newmans are very bad hunters.)

You obviously haven't taken into account that Newman Wartechers have the option of using attack techs >>

Or the fact that CAST Wartechers will take about 10 casts of Resta to heal himself, much less a beast. By the time you cast Resta the third time after running low on HP in a fight, either

A) The enemy/enemies that hurt you are already dead
B) You get hit again and get killed.

It's pretty sad, seeing a class try something they know they can't do. Other examples include:

Newman Fortefighters
Beast Fortegunners
Cast Fortetechers
Beast Guntechers
Newman Fighgunners
Newman Protransers

Admit it, all of the above horribly fail.

[happy_cricket]

What fails is playing the game, doing everything you possibly can to make it easy, then going online to combo complaining how boring the game is/ boasting that you have never died.

[Bleemo]

Beast Wartecher = Melee oriented, tech use for support/damaging physical resistant mobs.

Human Wartecher = Melee/Tech balance.

Cast Wartecher = Can pewpew well with handgun offhand. Other than that... lol.

Newman Wartecher = lol@gimpfortetecher