Wartechers Ambition of Illuminus Reaction

[Retehi]

Wartecher.

[omegapirate2k]

On 2007-04-16 17:34, Kimil wrote:
Here's the question:
To those of us who currently play as wartechers, who wishes the support tech level was higher ( at least like lvl 30 or something ) and who is concidering becoming an acrotecher? who's thinking of giving up the side job of a demi-techer for fortefighter, fighunner or Acrofighter?

Well, seeing as how I'm just levelling wartecher for the mission points to mean something, I'm going to have to say I'm giving it up.

And you know, resta at level 20 can still be a beautiful thing.

[Xaeris]

Sure I wish it were higher. I was looking forward to using Megistar for the sake of style. Just seems like it'd be kinda useless now at a 20 cap. Otherwise, meh. I'll be sticking with wartecher; a 30 cap on offensive skills is nothing to sneeze (Lv 4 Burn, wewt) and quite frankly, I think I'd go nuts being an acrotecher with its piddly melee options. No fists, no polearms, no twin sabers...eww.

[Rashiid]

You might wanna get that cough check Syc, might be worse then ya think.

Wartech (as stated above) is for fighting and teching (word?).

nowhere does it state its support.....(unless it does)

your ment for damage in both melee and magic.

[Rashiid]

On 2007-04-16 17:38, Sychosis wrote:

On 2007-04-16 17:37, Rashiid wrote:
since when did people want so support (w/ the exception of Ryno)

*cough*

o, and you might wanna change ur headline too Mr. Forteattacktecher

[Kimil]

I know that Wartecher wasn't inteded to be a support class by Sega, but it ended up that way because it had the second highest support techs.

Wartechers seemed to always be:
First Aid
In battle buffing
Debuffing.

I RARELY saw any wartecher using attach techs! except a few newman wartechers, which I found to be rare in compairison to Beast wartechers

[Sychosis]

On 2007-04-16 17:44, Rashiid wrote:

o, and you might wanna change ur headline too Mr. Forteattacktecher

It's a bit of a sarcastic title to show my dislike at being removed from my support role and being placed into an attack role (comparatively speaking of course) because ST said so.

It'll be a cold day in Hell before I abandon my Psycho Wand.

[SolomonGrundy]

Has it been said before?

Madoogs will mean an increase in spellcasting Wartechers. Why? Before there was not enough space on the palette for buffs AND attack techs, now there is. And cards are still the only 1 handed ranged option worth considering, so there is plenty of room on the palette for them. Yay!

[tailz]

i picked wartecher after maxing fighgunner n fortefighter (which was a bad choice, but i didnt wanna waste mission points). However, since i did this, i had most of my melee's - at least the ones i cared about - past 20, and most of my bullets at 20 or just under. Im not gonna lie, i have pretty much hated wartecher the entire time cuz of the stat drops (i was also a fortetecher to lv 4, n since i only have 8 or so techs, i had most of them to 15s n 20s b4 i went wT). But even tho im much weaker n theres hardly any PAs i have left to level, nuthin beats goin thru missions without a single ~mate. I can bring NPCs/PM n keep em alive (since we all kno theyre douchebags, especially bruce), and buff when i have to. But my main point i was heading to was that i have each of my buffs at 20, yay for me. However, there is ALMOST always at least one fortetecher in my party who has 21+ buffs. So ya, 20 buffs is a bummer for soloing(20 resta is the worst problem IMO) but keep in mind that now theres gonna be 3 other classes around who most likely have much higher buffs anyways. I kno wut it took to get supports to 20... but 50? id rather let AT's do the work lol especially if ST stops buff parties

[Soukosa]

On 2007-04-16 17:34, Kimil wrote:
Wartecher went from being the second best support tech class ( Fortetecher 30, Wartecher 20, Guntecher 10) to being the WORST support tech class ( Acrotecher 50, Fortetecher 40, Guntecher 30, Wartecher 20 ). The strong-ish support techs were the reason I became a wartecher in the first place, so this seems like a letdown to me...

I don't think ST ever intended for WT to be a strong support class, if support at all. Though like GT, it's not really easy to tell what they intended. Though, it does seem clear now that they understand that concept that a class with high defensive stats and strong buffs is broken in terms of balance. Granted, a strong offensive class is more or less the same way and thus why they didn't give the highest support techs to FT.