PSUJP Update 11/1: Birth of Guardians' Boost Road

[Soukosa]

Incentive is needed for playing the version 1 missions? I think they already started on that
http://www.mithra.to/~psu/uploader/src/psu8629.jpg

I bet alot of people will be spamming that mission when this comes into effect (that's The Mad Beasts S2, BTW).

[Golto]

On 2007-10-26 15:15, Soukosa wrote:
Incentive is needed for playing the version 1 missions? I think they already started on that
http://www.mithra.to/~psu/uploader/src/psu8629.jpg

I bet alot of people will be spamming that mission when this comes into effect (that's The Mad Beasts S2, BTW).

which resist unit is that,stun?

[beatrixkiddo]

Yes.

[Arika]

what is the "meaning of no charge party"? I saw them a lot, but no idea
EDIT: I know it now OMG, I need frags!! <_<


But.... what does this system help on preventing no charge party?


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Arika on 2007-10-26 23:11 ]</font>

[Mystil]

Another term for AFK runs.

They are sorta long gone on the US servers...

[Arika]

Repeatedly running a mission will up the boosting rate.

>>> why they want people to spam the same misison ?

[Lyrise]

They want people to do it in a designated mission, most likely one that hasn't been run by anyone in ages. Example, how many of you reading this are running a mission like Bruce's Dungeon right now or have run it in the past 48 hours?

[Mewn]

This sounds like a great way to get people to run the old missions, and keep interest up. Looking forward to seeing how this works out.

[Noblewine]

I hope it fixes the problem of moochers in a party though it only happens in the JP server. It be interesting if people started using Lab Recovery a bit more since it skips Ruler of the Plains.

[Arika]

Okay, I see the point now, but they say they want to prevent the increasing of no charge party right?
This only make people to do the no charge party in the old mission, instead of new mission