Why were Wartechers left out?

[Elley]

I don't understand why us Wartechers don't get level 21 buffs. Guntechers were raised... acrotechers get them as well. Are Wartechers that much more ridiculous in combat as to warrant a semi nerf in the support magic department?




0

[beatrixkiddo]

Guess so.

[Dragwind]

Oh teh noes....

WT is fine without them. Skills at 30 and attack techs at 30 makes you mostly a fighting/nuking class. Support at 20 is good enough for most of WT needs.

[Umberger]

I think they did that to make Wartechers an attacking type, and Guntechers a supporting type.

[Danger_Girl]

I think we should get 40 skills, 40 attack techs, 40 bullets, and 40 support techs.

But I might be a little biased.

[ChaosAngel92]

On 2008-01-04 23:12, Umberger wrote:
I think they did that to make Wartechers an attacking type, and Guntechers a supporting type.

So, the remain question is, why do they have S rank wands?

[Anduril]

On 2008-01-04 23:43, ChaosAngel92 wrote:

On 2008-01-04 23:12, Umberger wrote:
I think they did that to make Wartechers an attacking type, and Guntechers a supporting type.

So, the remain question is, why do they have S rank wands?

For Level 30 Attack TECHs maybe? I mean no matter how much PP a Madoog has its TP usually can't compare to a wand.

EDIT: Damn punctuation errors. >_<

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Anduril on 2008-01-04 23:51 ]</font>

[Ffuzzy-Logik]

What are these "attack techs" of which you speak? Do they do any damage?

[Finae]

Cry more

[Xaeris]

[b]Are Wartechers that much more ridiculous in combat as to warrant a semi nerf in the support magic department?




0

Yes actually. See, WTs get a 30 melee cap and the weapons to make it worth a damn. While support techs have some kind of odd allure that I can't figure out for the life of me, being able to buff 5/10% better than a Megistaride isn't even close to being worth that.