Cast PT lkk vs. red / knight

[Hrith]

Used a lumirus / hit charge and did some testing.

Using a muktrand, against a kakwane in white beasts s2. Had ata buff for both tests. Majarra level 30.

With LKK

19 misses, 95 hits
7 misses, 29 hits

With LHC

19 msses, 69 hits
4 misses, 42 hits

This is with a nasuyoteri bow against komazli in white beasts s2

LKK

6 misses, 16 hits

LHC

3 misses 18 hits.

But L/HC does not boost ATA like R/K does, that is irrelevant.

Also note how you used some of the weapons with the highest ATA on PT.

Let me help you with your figures, as well.

In your Nasuyoteri example (which PA, which level?), you are missing 37.5% of your hits with L/KK, 16.7% of your hits with L/HC.
Assuming you are dealing at least 1200 damage per bullet with L/HC, 1300 with L/KK, you do 81,250 damage using L/KK, when you do 99,960 using L/HC.
Using your figures, L/HC is 23% better than L/KK, on a weapon with high ATA.

Of course that is inaccurate, since your figures are dreadfully inaccurate.
If you want figures worth something, you'd have to record at least 1000 hits.

The weapons you'll use the most as PT are shotguns and lasers, which really do not have the same ATA as spears or longbows...

[mll]

I was under the impression that the R/K is just flat out better with every class, weapon and pa.

[Hrith]

Maybe not cast Gunmaster, although I still miss regularly in some situations.

[kejen]

No doubt red / knight is better. Wasn't saying lkk was.

And that was an exaggerated test. Miss too much with lkk.