4-slot Frames... do they exist?!

[Galax]

Well I'm just saying there is a chance everything could be wrong really.
But you can't use Chaos Theory as a reason to be sceptical about everything.

I honestly don't see how (if I have this part right) a video game has anything to do with this.
I remember Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory, though.
Good game.

[Chaos Rappy]

No, I think Kirukia meant the Chaos Theory as in the thing about how we didn't have proof that they could or couldn't have 4 slots, and about how either could or couldn't be proven... THAT Chaos Theory.

Because, as we know, the site isn't proof in itself. It isn't able to prove that it can't, it just says so... just like how it says Canon Rouge and Canon Bleu have two n's when they only have one in-game... <_<

[Kirukia]

Chaos Theory means anything can happen, unless I'm using it wrong.
Obviously there is always a chance something will be wrong. If your purpose was to simply state that, then I see no point. It's basically implied to everything.
But the database is USUALLY a reliable source.
So you can't say it's not true just because there is a small chance it could be false.
As far as I'm concerned, it's correct until proven otherwise.
And as far as I'm concerned, the site is proof. This is a site that specializes in Phantasy Star, so if it says something about PSZ, I'll believe it. If someone can prove it wrong, I'll believe them. But since nobody has shown me proof otherwise, I have no reason to believe the site is wrong. Do you see where I'm going with this?

[Chaos Rappy]

So... basically, you're one of the people who believes everything the site says... if the site said for you to jump off a cliff, would you do it? :P [/immaturity]

As for the Chaos Theory, you're somewhat using it right, but you yourself don't believe it obviously... the basis for it is that since something can't be proven wrong, it can't be proven right. You believe since the site can't be proven wrong, that it IS right. I, however, am a chaos theoreticist, and follow with the theory, even if I do believe I had proof myself, but do not have it any longer (**** Frames, I got better armors to carry ;P). So, I myself am at a loss since I have no proof, and now believe that since I can't prove it wrong, cannot prove myself right.

Do you see it all in the bigger picture now? This post holds no meaning on the discussion as a whole, but it does bring more light on the situation, yes?

[Kirukia]

I repeat, "The burden on proof lies with the individual making the claim."
If anybody says the site is wrong, then prove it.
Otherwise, there is no reason to believe it's wrong.
So even if there is a possibility, with no evidence, the possibility means nothing.

[Cruciarius]

Kids, calm down. :P

Someone provide a 4-slot frame for evidence. Until then, we'll assume the site information about frames is correct.

[Chaos Rappy]

I can't take pictures anymore, or at least cannot post the ones I can take (cellphone). <_<

[Cruciarius]

Then stop taking dirty pictures.

[Chaos Rappy]

So even if there is a possibility, with no evidence, the possibility means nothing.

Ah, but see, with the chaos theory, the possibility is everything! Because the figurative possibility of anything, nothing can be true, which is why the chaos theory is called the "CHAOS theory".

Trust me, when it comes to knowing anything in this world, me and chaos just connect two-to-two...

And about the cellphone thing, it's because I don't have an SD card for my cellphone, not because of "dirty pictures"... <_<

[Kirukia]

Well then maybe you're pudding and I eat you. Then what?
Then I win >D