Quick Questions? Come here for quick answers!

[reaper527]

for break stance, what constitutes a "breakable part". more specifically, does this apply to already broken parts?

for example, clearly on quartz's face or cater's tail, that would get the damage bonus when they are fresh. once that part breaks, will hitting that part more still get the break stance bonus or is it ineligible because it can't be broken further?

along the same lines, is break stance worth using, or should i just be putting those points into elemental stance?

[Kondibon]

for break stance, what constitutes a "breakable part". more specifically, does this apply to already broken parts?

for example, clearly on quartz's face or cater's tail, that would get the damage bonus when they are fresh. once that part breaks, will hitting that part more still get the break stance bonus or is it ineligible because it can't be broken further?

along the same lines, is break stance worth using, or should i just be putting those points into elemental stance?

No, only the part before it's broken. If you could max and take full advantage of both stances then yeah it would be for certain stuff, but as it is now, it's probably not worth it unless you're a special snowflake like me who needs to strut her independence by having bullshit skill trees.

[UnLucky]

Still... Waiting... And waiting...

Still bad, but marginally usable if you're not getting any of Force's elements as Fo/Te.

1SP in PF itself is all you need for something like the Motav, and After Burst is ok with the 100 T-Atk for 30s, but any more points than that are essentially wasted.

[Dark Emerald EXE]

If you feed nothing but strike weapons to a Mag what would the S-atk/Dex look like at max?

[.Jack]

What's the point of Crest of Carnage on a force-only weapon?

Spoiler!

[airprinzh2o]

If you feed nothing but strike weapons to a Mag what would the S-atk/Dex look like at max?

According to Cirnopedia, it will be the same mag as full S-Atk. The requirements for other 2 level 100 evolutions of S-Atk mag are as follows:

1) Range + Dex > Strike (Cygnus)
2) Tech + Dex > Strike (Libra)

Therefore if you're feeding all strike weapons then Range and Tech should be 0 and Dex would never exceed Strike.

Here's the link: http://pso2.cirnopedia.info/mag_1.php#nav

[Dark Emerald EXE]

According to Cirnopedia, it will be the same mag as full S-Atk. The requirements for other 2 level 100 evolutions of S-Atk mag are as follows:

1) Range + Dex > Strike (Cygnus)
2) Tech + Dex > Strike (Libra)

Therefore if you're feeding all strike weapons then Range and Tech should be 0 and Dex would never exceed Strike.

Here's the link: http://pso2.cirnopedia.info/mag_1.php#nav

I apologize. I mean like how much S-atk and DEX would you have at 175 if you fed your mag just striking weapons

[UnLucky]

If you feed nothing but strike weapons to a Mag what would the S-atk/Dex look like at max?

If you use 1-6* weapons, your mag will be 108/67, but feeding only 9*s would get it to 122/53

Using 7-8*s would land you somewhere in between

[Dark Emerald EXE]

If you use 1-6* weapons, your mag will be 108/67, but feeding only 9*s would get it to 122/53

Using 7-8*s would land you somewhere in between

Hmmm so i suppose if one wanted to be a S-atk JB user...they have some options when using JB...seeing that they all require T-atk to equip ><

[Xaeris]

I went to buy some AC on pso2es, but it seems they changed the format since I last bought some. Could someone tell me what these screens are asking for?

Spoiler!