Sig limits - 600 x 180 pixels, 35Kb, no more than 5 lines.

[IceBlink]

Bump to remind everyone, since everyone keeps forgetting. Oh I wish I had the sticky function.

On 2002-02-07 10:29, IceBlink wrote:
Bump to remind everyone, since everyone keeps forgetting. Oh I wish I had the sticky function.

balloon

Iceblink says:
*pointing tails*
Hitomi-Chan and Abdur101, your sigs are too tall. Please change.

[ABDUR101]

Ack shit..your right..
*changes to sig within limits*
*takes note to edit current sig*

Iceblink says:
ABDUR101 that sig it still too high

[ABDUR101]

*slams head on table*
That was the first sig I ever made, I was positive it was within the limits..
*roots through sig dir and finds sig within limits*

[BWS-1]

Hey Abdy?, why don't you take cute lil sigs like mine instead? the only thing I fear is that it might be UNDER the minimum sig limits. If that's the case, I'll have to use a bigger one or use certain methodes to make sure people actually see my sig. I can't think of how small it would show up on a screen with a resolutin of 2048 x 1536 X_x


F
a
l
l
o
w

t
h
e

a
r
r
o
w

t
o

g
e
t

t
o

m
y

s
i
g
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V

[ABDUR101]

Small sigs don't let me utilize and enhance what little skill I do have.
*Artwork tamperer*

[Ruri-Chan]

There! It's now 600x180 and 10KB :P

_________________


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Hitomi-Chan on 2002-02-16 02:29 ]</font>

[ABDUR101]

*points to Hitomi's sig*
HAHAH, now THATS funny. Bitch about being over the limit by afew pixels and she takes it to the max hehe.
*points to his otaku sig*
That wasn't over by far, and neither was the other one. Considering they were both FAR below the 35kb limit I doubt the extra 10-13 pixels made a drastic difference to anyone's browser.