If I'm not mistaken Sony is/was/already has dropped support of the HDD, basically because everyone abused it, and used it for piracy and stuff. In a nutshell.On 2007-01-26 05:33, BloodDragoon wrote:
PS2 would be cheat free if PC wasn't linked to it... >.>On 2007-01-26 00:35, nefarious wrote:
I'm so sick of the fact that there are areas that are "better" to do runs on, because otherwise you're just literally wasting time.
And screw PS2.
360 and PC could have new content/updates if they had put ps2 on an island of retarded obsoletion and hardware inferiority, and let 360/PC share a server, or just be on thier own.
The lack of ability to actually expand/update... is a fatal flaw.
EVERY mainstream successful MMO (Besides for PSO I think... I don't think PSO could update, I dunno, I never played it much) has had the ability to do more than just "unlock" pre-existing content.
I dare someone to name one, that has lacked that ability. (Besides for PSO)
Someone go start up a private server for PSU PC and put an EXP mod on, and release custom content, please?
Everquest on PS2 really didn't have any ability to store massive patches for content updates.
PSU PC private server? Well you still have Gameguard for protection so expect cheat city there...
All PSU PS2 needs is HDD support. The game would probably run alot smoother with it. I can be in the middle of Aht Urgran Whitegate on FFXI with my PS2 and not have any real load lag issues like I do on PSU.
HDD support would have been nice, in theory. BUT... They don't make them anymore. The new Slimline doesn't have the ability to even USE a HDD... In short, enabling it, would have been for a niche audience, and requiring it would have nerfed the PS2 user base.
Though I'm not terribly familiar with EQ on PS2, I'd guess not that many people played it, which would quasi-disqualify it from the MMO category and just make it an online RPG. Just like I don't really count Champions of Norath as an MMO.
Connect With Us