Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 39 of 39
  1. #31
    N-Sythe Syklo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Trick question, I don't live.
    Posts
    1,867

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Renvalt View Post
    Wait, seriously? You're not kidding, are you?

    I need to check this for myself.

    EDIT: Oh whaddya know - they do have it. And it's located as an image in a place that NOBODY will look at. Designer's theory tells me the upper left hand corner of any artistic presentation is where the viewer looks first. I mean, I DID take a Basic Design Fundamentals class in college two years ago. I know better than anyone that where they stuck that link is the worst choice of a placement spot for such a thing.
    Wouldn't it depend on how you were trained to right?

    E.g. Traditional chinese or japanese writing (especially vertical), you start top right - like reading manga.

    Are you a ship 8 player? Want some friends to get started? Start with me! (CURRENTLY Busy with university )

  2. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Enforcer MKV View Post
    On point, though...Definitely an interesting perspective he's got there. I know that a lot of Eastern MMOs are grindier than their western counterparts. Maybe it's a "Quantity over Quality" mindset?
    This isn't true. It's Korean MMOs that are generally "grindier", and this has little to do with cultural preferences as much as it has to do with the fact that, in Korea, MMOs are much more of a social thing, with players often playing in the same room as one another thanks to the prevalence of internet cafes as opposed to playing at home. (This is also why they generally do open-world PvP more often - it's easier for them to organize a retaliation when they can just gather people in the same room for a counter-attack.)

    Final Fantasy XI, the only "true Japanese MMO" in my mind, is based heavily upon the original Everquest and thus has an extremely solo-unfriendly mindset. And yeah, the original EQ was really, really grindy. That's more an "old MMO" thing than anything else.

    In truth, it wasn't until World of Warcraft came out that MMOs started shifting away from the "grind is life" mentality, but that also came alongside a shift of emphasis away from the world part of the MMO towards the game part of the MMO (which was NOT a net positive change, IMO). Aion, for example, is about a thousand times easier to hit the level cap in than Lineage II. Tera even moreso.

    Of course, this extrication of grind in MMOs probably also contributes to the phenomenon of exceptionally fast burnout in modern games, as players find themselves without any sort of goal to pursue so they just quit after the first or second month. Hence, developers are trying to find some sort of middle ground that keeps less-dedicated players hooked while giving hardcore players some sort of carrot to chase. In PSO2, they've got plenty of both - casual players can focus on grinding older or more easily-found rares with weaker affixes and trying to hit the 55 cap while the hardcore have the nearly un-findable 10*s to shoot for along with trying to grind and affix those things to the maximum.

    Unfortunately, they have a harder time finding a nice middle ground in terms of difficulty, as we all well know. Advance quests have been something of an attempt at that, but even they don't challenge the hardcore players as much as they really should. I'll still applaud them for the effort, however.

    Sorry for the wall of text. This is a topic near and dear to my heart, after all, since I pretty much grew up in the dawning days of the MMO.

  3. #33
    (⌐■_■) ShinMaruku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Firmly attached to Sil'fer's boobies
    Posts
    5,365

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zorafim View Post
    Hold on, hold up. Did you just say that PSO2 is easier because it's japanese? I thought the general reason japanese games weren't imported was because they were too difficult for us weak gaijin. When did this happen?
    Actually a bunch of Japanese games are easier than they are for the west. MGS and DMC and NG were legendary for how the Western Versions were in their diffuculty.

  4. #34
    Curiously attractive for a fish man Zorafim's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Under the sea
    Posts
    12,538

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Enforcer MKV View Post
    Okay, that gave me a good laugh...too bad I was taking a drink of water. @_@

    I think this is the third time in the last 72 hours or so. Ouch. Thiiiis is becoming a bad trend.
    Your poor monitor. You might want to start investing in a cover.

    Quote Originally Posted by Padium View Post
    Simply put, we are selfish, they are not. Its not about one being more positive than the other.
    If I understand your argument correctly... Because we're selfish, we're better at providing crucial information, and therefore make the world a better place? I follow your logic, though that conclusion seems counter-intuitive. But isn't that the concept which the western world is based off of?

  5. #35
    Space Hobobo Bo Bobo yoshiblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Liliparium Cafe
    Posts
    5,134

    Default

    Grey and grey morality.

  6. #36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyrusticae View Post
    This isn't true. It's Korean MMOs that are generally "grindier", and this has little to do with cultural preferences as much as it has to do with the fact that, in Korea, MMOs are much more of a social thing, with players often playing in the same room as one another thanks to the prevalence of internet cafes as opposed to playing at home. (This is also why they generally do open-world PvP more often - it's easier for them to organize a retaliation when they can just gather people in the same room for a counter-attack.)

    Final Fantasy XI, the only "true Japanese MMO" in my mind, is based heavily upon the original Everquest and thus has an extremely solo-unfriendly mindset. And yeah, the original EQ was really, really grindy. That's more an "old MMO" thing than anything else.

    In truth, it wasn't until World of Warcraft came out that MMOs started shifting away from the "grind is life" mentality, but that also came alongside a shift of emphasis away from the world part of the MMO towards the game part of the MMO (which was NOT a net positive change, IMO). Aion, for example, is about a thousand times easier to hit the level cap in than Lineage II. Tera even moreso.

    Of course, this extrication of grind in MMOs probably also contributes to the phenomenon of exceptionally fast burnout in modern games, as players find themselves without any sort of goal to pursue so they just quit after the first or second month. Hence, developers are trying to find some sort of middle ground that keeps less-dedicated players hooked while giving hardcore players some sort of carrot to chase. In PSO2, they've got plenty of both - casual players can focus on grinding older or more easily-found rares with weaker affixes and trying to hit the 55 cap while the hardcore have the nearly un-findable 10*s to shoot for along with trying to grind and affix those things to the maximum.

    Unfortunately, they have a harder time finding a nice middle ground in terms of difficulty, as we all well know. Advance quests have been something of an attempt at that, but even they don't challenge the hardcore players as much as they really should. I'll still applaud them for the effort, however.

    Sorry for the wall of text. This is a topic near and dear to my heart, after all, since I pretty much grew up in the dawning days of the MMO.
    This is something I felt PSO1 handled well. Grinding to the level cap was incredibly time intensive, but it was also optional. The meat of the game was up to, like, level 130 let's say (I don't know, it'll vary by class and skill level). Getting rares here and there that you could use without investing was a frequent occurrence all the way up to and into ultimate. This was the real player progression to me. Upgrading your gear was not an enormous hassle or stressful chore, it was something that just happened.

    Now, hunting for a particular rare with a particular stat (let's say, native/dark/hit) could be painstaking. But, then, that's the same as finding a rare at all in this game. Plus if you found another amazing item, like let's say my oft mentioned 50 hit Sange found while looking for a hit Chainsawd (it took 13 or so to find a 15 hit chainsawd, I consider that lucky), I could trade that sucker for what I wanted. Or maybe the 25 hit Asuka while looking for something else, or--

    Point is, they've removed the absurd yet optional level cap grind and turned it into an absurd gear grind that is comparably less optional, yet still optional if you don't care about using noticeably inferior items or what your weapons look like (in a dressup sim most people will care what their weapons look like, and you can bet they're counting on that).

    edit: Also, I love AQ's to bits. While HU is still at a serious disadvantage, enemies take on average longer to kill. If zonde wasn't so omgwtf, and hunters were faster and better prepared for things such as flinch, we'd really be on to something. I've always preferred games where multiple enemies take more time to kill than a game with a shitload of enemies with 1 hp. I feel this way in FPS games, RPG's, MMO's, all of it. Longer fights are just more fun.

  7. #37

    Default

    Longer fights are not more fun. they are absolutely NOT more fun. it's every MMO I played the began to opt for the longer fight nonsense, WoW, Lineage 2, everything! it isn't more fun at all. It's balance that is the issue. City of Heroes for example had the perfect enemy pace. More people show up? more team synergy was required. Higher ranked enemies replaced the low ranks that died in 1-2 hits. Skill timing, spacing and management was a must to keep enemies from swarming you. even though they went down quick, you had to be quick to.

    Long fights are just boring, t he game literally turns into a rhythm game. button 1-2-3-5-4 1-2-3-5-4 2-2-2 3. Next... no =/ don't like that at all. rapid changing situations are the best.

    That being said PSO2 hasn't mastered the battle encounter. Enemy AI is largely i ndividual and random. and they don't coordinate very well or have any kind of specific process you can adapt to.

    Also enemies don't counter ranged fighters whatsoever, so yes forces and gunners dominate everything.

  8. #38

    Default

    This depends on what you consider "longer." I consider an enemy taking 3-5 hits to kill ideal. Not one. Then you have things like we have now, with long range classes killing in one hit and short range classes being unable to keep up with the pace.

  9. #39
    Waiting on NA server...
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Albuquerque
    Posts
    39

    Default

    A comment on the "grindiness" of Korean MMOs:

    I've noticed that Korean MMOs tend to start small. VERY small. As if they're a proof of concept more than anything when they first start out. The grindiness is there to pad out the game and prevent people from maxing out immediately more than anything else.

    If the game can't hold its audience, it is abandoned. If people like it, more effort is put into it. The game grows, the grindiness is slowly phased out in favor of content so that people have more to do, and a more reasonable route to endgame content is established. (Usually to the chagrin of veteran players.)

    In a weird way, it's like the game company is pitching the game to its audience. Maybe indeed a webcafe audience is better for that sort of thing, but I think it's also the fact that there's a lot of these newbie MMOs to choose from.

    The biggest Korean MMOs I know of didn't get that way overnight. Games such as Mabinogi started out as one town and a tiny overworld with a dungeon or two. That one is huge now.

    On the western side, rather than many small games pitched to the populace to test the waters and see what'll sell, a lot of effort is taken to make an MMO into a huge production right from the start. Is it better or worse? I dunno if there's a right or wrong way in this sense. Seems like the usual case of playing pro/con. For the successful games, the end result is the same.

    For what it's worth, I never found PSU to be particularly grindy. Most of the content scaled, so you could pretty much do whatever areas you wanted easily from the beginning. The bad part of that is you ran out of content fairly quickly, which probably explains the timed release of story instances. We'll see how things go with PSO2.

Similar Threads

  1. the difference between END and STA
    By Chuck_Norris in forum PSU General
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: Jul 19, 2007, 02:23 PM
  2. what the difference between Deband and Dizas?
    By SolomonGrundy in forum PSU: Gameplay, Guides & Walkthroughs
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Jan 13, 2007, 02:11 PM
  3. DEFINING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ASIAN AND AZN
    By etlitch in forum Fresh Kills Landfill
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: Dec 16, 2006, 10:52 PM
  4. What's the difference between MST and TP?
    By Buddant in forum PSU General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Nov 5, 2006, 02:45 PM
  5. Replies: 11
    Last Post: Dec 5, 2005, 10:55 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •